the text field as a phrase of contiguous terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Andreas Hubold
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 12:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: dismax query does not match with additional field in qf
Okay, sounds reasonable. However I did
ubject: Re: dismax query does not match with additional field in qf
Okay, sounds reasonable. However I didn't expect this when reading the
documentation of the dismax query parser.
Especially the need to escape special characters (and which ones) was
not clear to me as the dismax query parser
-- From: Andreas Hubold
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: dismax query does not match with additional field in qf
Hi,
I ran into a problem with the Solr dismax query parser. We're using Solr
4.10.0 and the field types mentioned below are take
t: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: dismax query does not match with additional field in qf
Hi,
I ran into a problem with the Solr dismax query parser. We're using Solr
4.10.0 and the field types mentioned below are taken from the example
schema
Andreas Hubold wrote on 09/30/2014 05:14 PM:
I ran into a problem with the Solr dismax query parser.
...
I'd expect that an additional field in the qf parameter would not lead
to fewer matches.
Okay, the above example is a rather crude test but I'd like to
understand it. Is this a bug in Solr?
Hi,
I ran into a problem with the Solr dismax query parser. We're using Solr
4.10.0 and the field types mentioned below are taken from the example
schema.xml.
In a test we have a document with rather strange content in a field
named "name_tokenized" of type "text_general":
abc_
(It's a te
