Hello Jack,
4.10.3 as already indicated in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7249
> Great, glad to hear it!
> One last question: What release of Solr are you using?
> -- Jack Krupansky
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Arsen wrote:
>> Hello Jack,
>>
>> Jack, you made "my day" for
variant (which was shorter, sorry).
>
> Thanks again for your help!
> Have a nice day.
>
> > -- Jack Krupansky
>
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Arsen wrote:
>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Found discrepancy between LuceneQParser and ExtendedDism
ve same result.
> So, I left most recent variant (which was shorter, sorry).
>
> Thanks again for your help!
> Have a nice day.
>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Arsen wrote:
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Found discrepanc
hey all give same result.
So, I left most recent variant (which was shorter, sorry).
Thanks again for your help!
Have a nice day.
> -- Jack Krupansky
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Arsen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Found discrepancy between LuceneQParser and Exte
sky
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Arsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Found discrepancy between LuceneQParser and ExtendedDismaxQParser when
> executing following query:
> ((*:* AND -area) OR area:[100 TO 300]) AND objectId:40105451
>
> When executing it through Solr Admin panel
Hello,
Found discrepancy between LuceneQParser and ExtendedDismaxQParser when
executing following query:
((*:* AND -area) OR area:[100 TO 300]) AND objectId:40105451
When executing it through Solr Admin panel and placing query in "q" field I
having following debug output for Luc
