Re: copyField for big indexes

2011-08-22 Thread Tom
query. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-for-big-indexes-tp3275712p3276994.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: copyField for big indexes

2011-08-22 Thread Bill Bell
s to me if you have lot's of data and a large indexes, copyField >should be avoided. > >Any thoughts? > >-- >View this message in context: >http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-for-big-indexes-tp3275712p327 >5712.html >Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: copyField for big indexes

2011-08-22 Thread Tom
Thanks Erick -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-for-big-indexes-tp3275712p3275816.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: copyField for big indexes

2011-08-22 Thread Erick Erickson
xes, copyField > should be avoided. > > Any thoughts? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-for-big-indexes-tp3275712p3275712.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

copyField for big indexes

2011-08-22 Thread Tom
just query title: OR post: So it seems to me if you have lot's of data and a large indexes, copyField should be avoided. Any thoughts? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-for-big-indexes-tp3275712p3275712.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list