Re: copyField: String vs Text Field

2008-08-28 Thread Walter Underwood
"stemmed and stopped" is short for using a stemmer and removing stopwords. Specifically, StopFilterFactory and EnglishPorterFilterFactory are in the analysis chain. wunder On 8/27/08 10:26 PM, "Jake Conk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Walter, > > What do you mean by when you stemmed and stopp

Re: copyField: String vs Text Field

2008-08-27 Thread Jake Conk
Hi Walter, What do you mean by when you stemmed and stopped your title field? Thanks, - Jake On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/27/08 5:54 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> That's really only one use case though... the other b

Re: copyField: String vs Text Field

2008-08-27 Thread Walter Underwood
On 8/27/08 5:54 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That's really only one use case though... the other being to have a > single stored field that is analyzed multiple different ways. We are the other use case. We take a title and put it in three fields: one merely lowercased, one s

Re: copyField: String vs Text Field

2008-08-27 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Does that mean that if I were to edit the data > then the field it was copied to will not be updated? You can't really "edit" a document in Lucene or Solr, really just overwrite an old document with an en

Re: copyField: String vs Text Field

2008-08-27 Thread Jake Conk
Yonik, Thanks for the reply. Does that mean that if I were to edit the data then the field it was copied to will not be updated? I assume it does get deleted if I delete the record right? I understand how it can make searching simpler by copying fields to one but would that really make it faster?

Re: copyField: String vs Text Field

2008-08-27 Thread Yonik Seeley
Jake, copyField exists to decouple document values (on the update size) from how they are indexed. >From the example schema: -Yonik On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if there was an added advantage in using > to copy a string f

copyField: String vs Text Field

2008-08-27 Thread Jake Conk
Hello, I was wondering if there was an added advantage in using to copy a string field to a text field? If the field is copied to a text field then why not just make the field a text field and eliminate copying its data? If you are going to use full text searching on that field which you cant d