Hi All,
I have exact problem mentioned in this link below.
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Error-deleting-copy-field-td4393097.html
I want to delete all the copy fields with the same source name
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/pi_squared/schema/copyfields
{
"source":"
io.
>> HTH,
>> Emir
>> --
>> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
>> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>>> On 22 Oct 2018, at 15:22, Chris Wareham
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
lting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
On 22 Oct 2018, at 15:22, Chris Wareham wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a number of fields defined in my managed-schema file that are used as
the sources for a copy field:
Can I set both the indexed and stored values to false for the
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a number of fields defined in my managed-schema file that are used as
> the sources for a copy field:
>
> stored="true"/>
> stored="true" multiValued="true"/>
> stored="true" multiV
Hi folks,
I have a number of fields defined in my managed-schema file that are
used as the sources for a copy field:
stored="true"/>
stored="true" multiValued="true"/>
stored="true" multiValued="true"/>
stored="false&
i will write update processor in index pipe line.
> >>
> >> I feel this is very good feature to support.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Anil
> >>
> >> On 12 July 2018 at 22:59, Andrea Gazzarini
> wrote:
> >>
> >> &g
07:04 Anil ha scritto:
>
>> Thanks Andrea. i will write update processor in index pipe line.
>>
>> I feel this is very good feature to support.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anil
>>
>> On 12 July 2018 at 22:59, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
>>
>> > H
ks Andrea. i will write update processor in index pipe line.
>
> I feel this is very good feature to support.
>
> Thanks,
> Anil
>
> On 12 July 2018 at 22:59, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
>
> > Hi Anil,
> > The copy Field directive is not what you're looking
Thanks Andrea. i will write update processor in index pipe line.
I feel this is very good feature to support.
Thanks,
Anil
On 12 July 2018 at 22:59, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Hi Anil,
> The copy Field directive is not what you're looking for because it doesn't
> change th
the field without having
> to specify the full string, consider a DateRangeField.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Anil wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > i have a date field which needs to copied to different field with
> different
> > format/
utomatic mode (where it discovers
> fields). It's working fine with one exception. The problem is that
> Solr maps the discovered "meta_creation_date" is assigned the type
> TrieDateField.
>
> Unfortunately, that type is limited in a number of ways (
t; On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Anil wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > i have a date field which needs to copied to different field with
> different
> > format/value. is there any way to achieve this using copy field ? or
> needs
> > to be done when creating solr documen
i have a date field which needs to copied to different field with different
> format/value. is there any way to achieve this using copy field ? or needs
> to be done when creating solr document itself.
>
> lets say createdDate is 10-23-2017 10:15:00, it needs to be copied to
> tr
Hi Anil,
The copy Field directive is not what you're looking for because it doesn't
change the stored value of a field.
What you need is an Update Request Processor, which is a kind of
interceptor in the indexing chain (i.e. It allows you to change an incoming
document before it ge
HI,
i have a date field which needs to copied to different field with different
format/value. is there any way to achieve this using copy field ? or needs
to be done when creating solr document itself.
lets say createdDate is 10-23-2017 10:15:00, it needs to be copied to
transformedDate field
> Mississauga, Ontario L5N 1P9
> Save money. Live better.
>
> On 2018-06-06, 5:07 PM, "Steve Rowe" wrote:
>
>Hi Ikenna,
>
>If the source field(s) are dynamic fields, then you have to give the same
> spelling you used when you created the copy
Live better.
On 2018-06-06, 5:07 PM, "Steve Rowe" wrote:
Hi Ikenna,
If the source field(s) are dynamic fields, then you have to give the same
spelling you used when you created the copy field. E.g. for ‘item_desc_en’, if
the source field in the copy field directive is ‘*
Hi Ikenna,
If the source field(s) are dynamic fields, then you have to give the same
spelling you used when you created the copy field. E.g. for ‘item_desc_en’, if
the source field in the copy field directive is ‘*_desc_en’, then you have to
use that when you issue the delete.
You can find
Hi all,
I encountered an error when using SOLR cloud 7.2.1. I used the UI to add a
bunch of “copy fields” to a field named “_text_”, and now, I can’t delete the
copy fields nor the field.
I get the error message when I attempt to delete a copy field: Copy field
directive not found
uld also mix & match that with a if you wanted sku1 and sku2 to have special types, but some ohther more
common type for other sku* fields.
: Regards,
: Alex
:
: On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 2:54 AM jatin roy, wrote:
:
: > Any update?
: >
: > From: jati
; To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Copy field on dynamic fields?
>
> Hi,
>
> Can we create copy field on dynamic fields? If yes then how it decide
> which field should be copied to which one?
>
> For example: if I have dynamic field: category_* and while indexing 4
&g
Any update?
From: jatin roy
Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2018 12:37 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Copy field on dynamic fields?
Hi,
Can we create copy field on dynamic fields? If yes then how it decide which
field should be copied to which one?
For
Hi,
Can we create copy field on dynamic fields? If yes then how it decide which
field should be copied to which one?
For example: if I have dynamic field: category_* and while indexing 4 fields
are formed such as:
category_1
category_2
category_3
category_4
and now I have to copy the contents
On 12/8/2017 1:03 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Second, grouping works fine in distributed mode with a couple of
restrictions, see the reference guide. Collapse/Expand (an alternative
to standard grouping) requires that all the members of a group be on
the same shard.
In 5.x, distributed grouping s
Most often, people don't bother storing the copyfield since the stored
> value is available in the original, the copyField destination is just
> used for things like you're interested in.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Bradley
value is available in the original, the copyField destination is just
used for things like you're interested in.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Bradley Belyeu
wrote:
> I’m struggling a bit getting a copy field & regex tokenizer to work like
interested in.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Bradley Belyeu
wrote:
> I’m struggling a bit getting a copy field & regex tokenizer to work like I
> think it should…
> I have an open source project I’m just starting out with here:
> https://github.com/youversion/solrcloud
&
On 12/8/2017 9:56 AM, Bradley Belyeu wrote:
> I’m wanting to do a result grouping by the first three characters, period, &
> digit(s). For example, docs with the unique keys JHN.3.16 & JHN.3.17 I would
> want grouped together.
> So my thought was to define another field and then copy the USFM int
I’m struggling a bit getting a copy field & regex tokenizer to work like I
think it should…
I have an open source project I’m just starting out with here:
https://github.com/youversion/solrcloud
I have a uniqueKey field USFM defined as:
And a USFM will always be in the pattern of 3 charac
.nabble.com/Copy-field-from-string-to-date-tp4348173p4348303.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> and what could be the issues with schema less?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-from-string-to-date-tp4348173p4348298.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-from-string-to-date-tp4348173p4348298.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
s anything to do with the parses or how do I check if the parser is right
> ??
>
> Thanks,
> Krishna
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-from-string-to-date-tp4348173p4348275.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
*) still hold dates as date fields.Can you let me know if there
is anything to do with the parses or how do I check if the parser is right
??
Thanks,
Krishna
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-from-string-to-date-tp4348173p4348275.html
Sent from the
ies?
>
> Thanks,
> Krishna
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-from-string-to-date-tp4348173p4348241.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
helps. "
Can you give me an example for this as I want the text to be queried with
date queries?
Thanks,
Krishna
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-from-string-to-date-tp4348173p4348241.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
bq: We want to use a copy field as a source for another copy field.
As asked, this is not supported. You can copy the same source field to
multiple copy fields however.
copyFields can take glob-type source specifications if that helps.
It would help if you gave concrete examples. You say "
We want to use a copy field as a source for another copy field.
The problem is source field is from a text (dynamic field ) and
destination field should be date
tried changing the dynamic field datatype but it throws error.
ideally my search index data source is outlook PST files as the index
p the genera in the genus
field.
But as Erick mentioned, you may have problems of entity recognition.
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.co
"hey"
Catching nothing at all for the second KWF
<http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4347541/1.png>
Well, I have to say I'm so confused with this behaviour, have I forgot
something?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-
it at indexing time (When we post pdf files, to
> extractor) the field doesn't even appear. We think it's because the info
> becomes from another copyField.
>
> Did I misunderstand your suggestion?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4347013.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
your suggestion?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4347013.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
genus
>
> I realized that all genus are contained on species.
>
> So, there is a way to make a facet with just the first word of a field, like
> I've got for the field:
>
> abelmoschus achanioides
> abies colimensis
> abies concolor
>
> Just use the first word
field:
abelmoschus achanioides
abies colimensis
abies concolor
Just use the first word of those?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4346846.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
outputUnigrams="true"/>
>ignoreCase="true"/>
>ignoreCase="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We have 2 KWF files, "species" and then "genus". It seems that is just
> w
, "species" and then "genus". It seems that is just
working with genus.
Since I'm not able to use copy fields, what choices I have?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4346665.html
Sent from
is:
>
> Field chain analyzer.
> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4346602/1.png>
>
> KWF-genus file
> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4346602/3.png>
>
> Test output.
> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4346602/2.png>
>
> So
file/n4346602/2.png>
Sorry for the mistake
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4346602.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hink there is a missing split in between the 2 KWFs.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4346601.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
nt.txt"/>
>pattern="[0-9]+|(\-)(\s*)" replacement=""/>
>
> outputUnigrams="true"/>
>ignoreCase="true"/>
>ignoreCase="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nevertheless, there is no second processing for keep word filter as (I)
> expect. Am I missing something?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-source-of-copy-field-tp4346425p4346593.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
oses, like this:
Nevertheless, there is no second processing for keep word filter as (I)
expect. Am I missing something?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Copy-field-a-sourc
On 7/17/2017 4:26 PM, tstusr wrote:
> We want to use a copy field as a source for another copy field or some kind
> of post processing of a field.
> As an example imagine we have on species
>
> abies durangensis
> abies flinckii
>
> so, after post processing, we exp
st copy from attr_content* into
both. You wouldn't get the different tokenization, but presumably you
don't particularly need it on the second part of the chain.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:26 PM, tstusr wrote:
> Hi
>
> We want to use a copy field as a source f
Hi
We want to use a copy field as a source for another copy field or some kind
of post processing of a field.
The problem is here. We have a field from a text that is captured by a
field, like this:
which has (at the end of the processing) just the words in a field
ence. The EEE format is most certainly
the java.util.Date.toString() method being called when re-creating the
field.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Atomic-Update-w-Date-Copy-Field-tp4293779p4295049.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
float)" method. I
>> then check for a Date instance and format as necessary.
>>
>> Any ideas on a better approach or does it sound like this is the way to go?
>> I wasn't sure if this could be accomplished in a filter or some other way.
>>
>>
>>
gt; Any ideas on a better approach or does it sound like this is the way to go?
> I wasn't sure if this could be accomplished in a filter or some other way.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Atomic-Update-w-Date-Copy-Fie
stance and format as necessary.
Any ideas on a better approach or does it sound like this is the way to go?
I wasn't sure if this could be accomplished in a filter or some other way.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Atomic-Update-w-Date-Copy-Field-tp42937
ield. Is there a way that we
can force the copy field to always use "-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ" as the
resulting text format without having to always include the field in the
update?
schema
/update (full)
-
{
"id":
oesn't match a dynamicField.. Schema file is
> /opt/solr/example/solr/demo7/conf/schema.xml
>
> My schema.xml :
>
> required="true" multiValued="false" />
> stored="true" required="false" />
>
>
>
>
> Please hel
My schema.xml :
Please help me.
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copy-field-source-not-working-in-solr-schema-xml-tp4273355.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ading your config) , so you should build it to see the suggestions
Hard to believe it depends on your copyfield , from the Suggester
perspective , it doesn't know if the field configured is coming from a copy
field or not.
Cheers
2015-09-21 11:34 GMT+01:00 sara hajili :
> hi all
>
query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/post/suggest?suggest=true&suggest.dictionary=mySuggester&wt=json&suggest.q=solr
but when i used one field (not copy field ) i got answer.
how i solve my problem with copy field?
Thanks Steve and Yonik. This now makes sense. Updating the doc will be of
a big help.
With regards to deleting a copy-field, what I found is that if I have N
instances of the same copy-field, I have to issue N deletes to remove them
all. This behavior matches with the add and need to be kept
> On May 6, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
>> It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times -
>> according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has
>> been used in the past to eff
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times -
> according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has
> been used in the past to effectively boost terms in the source field.
Yep, used to be r
mutiply specified
copy field rule will delete all of them, but this isn’t tested, so I’m not sure.
There is no replace-copy-field command because copy field rules don’t have
dependencies (i.e., nothing else in the schema refers to copy field rules),
unlike fields, dynamic fields and field types
Hi Everyone,
I am using the Schema API to add a new copy field per:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schema+API#SchemaAPI-AddaNewCopyFieldRule
Unlike the other "Add" APIs, this one will not fail if you add an existing
copy field object. In fact, after when I call th
Yes, the "copied" value is always the original one (the stored), regardless
any analysis, which is field-scoped
On 23 Apr 2015 19:13, "Kaushik" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> What is the order in which these occur?
>
>
>- Copy field
>- Analyzer
>
Hello,
What is the order in which these occur?
- Copy field
- Analyzer
The other way of asking the above question I guess is, if I copy an _txt
field to _t field, does the analyzer of _t get the orignial text sent to
_txt field or the analyzed tokens from it?
Thanks,
Kaushik
On 4/15/2015 2:02 AM, Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
> My solr installation is in cloud mode... so the basic solr stop and start
> does not update the configuration right?
>
> I started solr using:
> solr -c -Dbootstrap_confdir=C:\solr-5.0.0\server\solr\patientsCollection\conf
> -Dcollection.configNam
e.org
Subject: Re: sort by a copy field error
Really strange to me: the cause should be what Shawn already pointed out,
because that error is raised when:
SchemaField sf = req.getSchema().getFieldOrNull(field);
is null:
if (null == sf) {
...
throw new SolrExce
ginal Message-
From: Andrea Gazzarini [mailto:a.gazzar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 April 2015 19:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort by a copy field error
Hi Pedro
Please post the request that produces that error
Andrea
On 14 Apr 2015 19:33, "Pedro Figueiredo"
wrote:
I® is registered in the USPTO by CMU"
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Gazzarini [mailto:a.gazzar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 April 2015 19:47
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort by a copy field error
Hi Pedro
Please post the request that produces that error
Andrea
On 14
USA | BRAZIL | MOZAMBIQUE | ANGOLA
A CMMI® LEVEL 5 RATED COMPANY CMMI® is registered in the USPTO by CMU"
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Sent: 14 April 2015 19:44
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sort by a copy field error
On 4
Hi Pedro
Please post the request that produces that error
Andrea
On 14 Apr 2015 19:33, "Pedro Figueiredo"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have a pretty basic question: how can I sort by a copyfield?
>
>
>
> My schema conf is:
>
>
>
> stored="true" omitNorms="true" termVectors="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
On 4/14/2015 11:32 AM, Pedro Figueiredo wrote:
> And when I try to sort by "name_sort" the following error is raised:
>
> "error": {
>
> "msg": "sort param field can't be found: name_sort",
>
> "code": 400
>
> }
What was the exact sort parameter you sent to Solr?
Did you reload the cor
Hello,
I have a pretty basic question: how can I sort by a copyfield?
My schema conf is:
And when I try to sort by "name_sort" the following error is raised:
"error": {
"msg": "sort param field can't be found: name_sort",
"code": 400
}
Thanks in advanced,
to match "true" and "false" and
> > replace them with "0" and "1" ?
> >
> >
> > : Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:57:03 -0700
> > : From: Kevin Osborn
> > : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > : To: solr-user@lucen
ate: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:57:03 -0700
> : From: Kevin Osborn
> : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> : To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> : Subject: copy field from boolean to int
> :
> : I was hoping to use DocValues, but one of my fields is a boolean, which
> is
> : no
ybe 2
instances of RegexReplaceProcessorFactory to match "true" and "false" and
replace them with "0" and "1" ?
: Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:57:03 -0700
: From: Kevin Osborn
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: cop
I was hoping to use DocValues, but one of my fields is a boolean, which is
not currently supported by DocValues. I can use a copyField to convert my
boolean to a string. Is there is anyway to use a copyField to convert from
a boolean to a tint?
thank you very much Mr. Sumit
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-define-the-copy-field-like-title-tp468p471.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I just wonder can I define copy field like this
instead of
millions thank you
Rachun
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-define-the-copy-field-like-title-tp468.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes it's legitimate to copy like
-
Sumit Arora
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-define-the-copy-field-like-title-tp468p470.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Appended.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vishgupt
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 6:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr Copy field append values ?
Hi ,
Schema like this
external_id is multivalued field.
I want to know will values of upc will be
value of
external_id field 131 or 131,423.
Thanks
Vishal
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Copy-field-append-values-tp4095862.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt;
> main_s
> final_s
>
>
> backup_s
> final_s
>
>
> final_s
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Jack Krupansky
> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 8:20 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subj
esday, August 07, 2013 7:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SOLR Copy field if no value on destination
Hi,
Is possible to copy a value of a field to another if the destination doesn't
have value?
An example:
a.. Indexing an rss
b.. The feed has the fields link and guid, but some
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: SOLR Copy field if no value on destination
Hi,
Is possible to copy a value of a field to another if the destination doesn't
have value?
An example:
a.. Indexing an rss
b.. The feed has the fields link and guid, but sometimes guid cannot be
present in the
Yes, it is possible to copy from a field to another field that has no value.
In fact, that is the only kind of copy you should be doing unless the field is
multivalued.
IOW, copy field is not “replace field”.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Luís Portela Afonso
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 7:22
Hi,
Is possible to copy a value of a field to another if the destination doesn't
have value?
An example:
Indexing an rss
The feed has the fields link and guid, but sometimes guid cannot be present in
the feed
I have a field that i will copy values with the name finalLink
Now i want to copy guid
Not that I know of, sorry.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Kai Gülzau wrote:
> I there a way to postprocess a field after analyze?
>
> Saying postprocess I think of renaming, moving or appending fields.
>
>
> Some more information:
>
> My schema.xml contains several language suffix
I there a way to postprocess a field after analyze?
Saying postprocess I think of renaming, moving or appending fields.
Some more information:
My schema.xml contains several language suffixed fields (nouns_de, ...).
Each of these is analyzed in a language dependent way:
Hello,
I think you don't have that much tuning possiblities using only the
schema.xml file.
You will have to write some custom Java code (subclasses of
UpdateRequestProcessor and UpdateRequestProcessorFactory), build a Java jar
containing your custom code, put that jar in one of the path declared
Can we limit copyfield source condition?
for example if we want to make lookup in source="product_name" and
dest="some_dest"
so our syntax would become
How about copying only those product_names having status=0 AND attribute1=1
AND attribute2=0.
assume status,attribute1,attribute2 and product_name
wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your reply!!
>
> This is the problem I face now when using dismax.
>
> I have almost 30 fields (Some are dynamic fields from database) copied in to
> copy field that is being used for default search. Now when I search using
> dismax I need to include t
Thanks a lot for your reply!!
This is the problem I face now when using dismax.
I have almost 30 fields (Some are dynamic fields from database) copied in to
copy field that is being used for default search. Now when I search using
dismax I need to include the boost for all the fields in the
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to boost score of particular field in a copy field?
Hi,
I have 10 fields copied in to a single copy field for default search. I am
trying to boost one particular field in that copy field, but I am not sure
how boo
Hi,
I have 10 fields copied in to a single copy field for default search. I am
trying to boost one particular field in that copy field, but I am not sure
how boosting in copy field work. Can someone let me know how boosting works
in copy field?
Thanks,
BB
--
View this message in context
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
