-complex-queries-tp4224931p4225147.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
. However, I would like to know if this response time is a typical
> "Solr speed" based on 15 M records.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-complex-queries-tp4224931p4224988.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
if this response time is a typical
"Solr speed" based on 15 M records.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-complex-queries-tp4224931p4224988.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing li
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-complex-queries-tp4224931.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ponse time for the query.
In all the 10 queries I tested (one by one), the response time were
consistently much better with !cache=false.
Does it make sense?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-
27;m sure, that this is the real query, going to SOLR, cause I checked it
> before sending (SolrQuery.toString())
>
> I can't find out what exactly am I misunderstanding (and what results am I
> getting - they are really strange).
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this mes
and what results am I
getting - they are really strange).
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-complex-queries-misunderstanding-tp4175188.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ly when proximity=40 ;-)
hth
roman
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:28 AM, sayeed wrote:
> Hi,
> Is it possible to search complex queries like
> (consult* or advis*) NEAR(40) (fee or retainer or salary or bonus)
> in solr
>
>
>
>
> -
> Sayeed
> --
> View this message
omplex queries like
> (consult* or advis*) NEAR(40) (fee or retainer or salary or bonus)
> in solr
>
>
>
>
> -
> Sayeed
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Complex-Queries-in-solr-tp4096288.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Hi,
Is it possible to search complex queries like
(consult* or advis*) NEAR(40) (fee or retainer or salary or bonus)
in solr
-
Sayeed
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Complex-Queries-in-solr-tp4096288.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive
quot; AND field:(value1 OR value2 OR value3)
>
> does that do the trick for you?If not, could you elaborate with
> an example?
>
> Erik
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/complex-queries-tp17095335p26312245.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: This goes back to my question about access control lists. So, I have all
: my documents, which are products. And then someone suggested that I have
: a separate user document type with a multi-value field of productIDs.
:
: In SQL, this would be the equivalent of:
:
: "SELECT * from product
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2008 6:03:34 PM
Subject: Re: complex queries
On May 6, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
> I don't think this is possible, but I figure that I would ask.
>
On May 6, 2008, at 8:57 PM, Kevin Osborn wrote:
I don't think this is possible, but I figure that I would ask.
So, I want to find documents that match a search term and where a
field in those documents are also in the results of a subquery.
Basically, I am looking for the Solr equivalent of
I don't think this is possible, but I figure that I would ask.
So, I want to find documents that match a search term and where a field in
those documents are also in the results of a subquery. Basically, I am looking
for the Solr equivalent of doing a SQL IN clause.
As I said, I don't think it
15 matches
Mail list logo
