I was looking(in process of making my own) into solr's default clustering
component for carrot2. In the clustering component class there are 2 methods
where the clustering algorithms are called:
in the overridden process method
SolrDocumentList solrDo
Though I am interacting with Dawid (creator of Carrot2) on Carrot2 mailing
list however just wanted to post my problem to a wider audience.
I am using Solr 4.7 (on both windows and linux) and saved my
lingo-attributes.xml file from the workbench which I am using in Solr. Note
that for testing I am
*org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown Search Component:
clusteringComponent*
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-in-including-both-clustering-component-and-spellchecker-for-solr-search-results-at-the-same-e-tp3128864p3136756.html
Sent from the Solr -
This example loads two fictional components. Use spellcheck and clustering
instead.
704
705
708
709 explicit
710 10
711
712
716
725
730
746
754
758
764
> would you please give me an example for custom request handler
>
> -
would you please give me an example for custom request handler
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-in-including-both-clustering-component-and-spellchecker-for-solr-search-results-at-the-same-e-tp3128864p3128893.html
Sent
Use a custom request handler and define both components as in the example for
these individual request handlers.
> I want to include both clustering and spellchecker in my search results.
> but at a time i am able to include only one. Only one, with which
> i am setting default=true. than how ca
e in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-in-including-both-clustering-component-and-spellchecker-for-solr-search-results-at-the-same-e-tp3128864p3128864.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> and my second question is does clustering effect indexes.
>
No, it doesn't. Clustering is performed only on the search results produced
by Solr, it doesn't change anything in the index.
Cheers,
Staszek
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-is-solr-clustering-component-tp3121484p3124627.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> I just went through solr wiki page
> for clustering. But i am not getting what
> is the benefit of using clustering. Can anyone tell me what
> is actually
> clusering and what its use in indexing and searching.
> does it effect search results??
> Please reply
It is for search result clustering.
sage in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-is-solr-clustering-component-tp3121484p3121484.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks much Stan,
Ramdev
On May 16, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Stanislaw Osinski wrote:
Both of the clustering algorithms that ship with Solr
(Lingo and STC) are designed to allow one document to appear in more than one
cluster, which actually does make sense in many scenario
>
> Both of the clustering algorithms that ship with Solr (Lingo and STC) are
>> designed to allow one document to appear in more than one cluster, which
>> actually does make sense in many scenarios. There's no easy way to force
>> them to produce hard clusterings because this would require a comp
Thanks for the confirmation, I'll take a look at the issue.
S.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 17:24, wrote:
> That did make a difference, I now see the exact number of cluster i see
> from the workbench.
> I am of course interested in why the config changes did not have much
> effect. However, I am ha
That did make a difference, I now see the exact number of cluster i see from
the workbench.
I am of course interested in why the config changes did not have much effect.
However, I am happy that by adding the threshold to my request URL produces the
desired results
let me know if I can do any m
> I added the parameter as you suggested.
> (LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold) into the searchComponent
> section that describes the Clustering module
> Changing the value of the parameter did not have any effect on my search
> results.
>
> However, when I used the Carrot2 wor
arkus Jelsma
wrote:
Yes, you can set engine specific parameters. Check the comments
in your
snippety.
> Hi:
> I recently included the CLustering component into Solr and
updated the
> requestHandler a
> Both of the clustering algorithms that ship with Solr (Lingo and STC) are
> designed to allow one document to appear in more than one cluster, which
> actually does make sense in many scenarios. There's no easy way to force
> them to produce hard clusterings because this would require a complete
gThreshold
.
Cheers,
Staszek
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 18:21, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Yes, you can set engine specific parameters. Check the comments in your
> snippety.
>
> > Hi:
> > I recently included the CLustering component into Solr and updated the
> > requestHand
Yes, you can set engine specific parameters. Check the comments in your
snippety.
> Hi:
> I recently included the CLustering component into Solr and updated the
> requestHandler accordingly (in solrconfig.xml). Snippet of the Config for
> the CLuserting:
>
>name=&q
Hi:
I recently included the CLustering component into Solr and updated the
requestHandler accordingly (in solrconfig.xml).
Snippet of the Config for the CLuserting:
default
org.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm
20
I've seen that before on a 3.1 check out after i compiled the clustering
component, copied the jars and started Solr. For some reason , recompiling
didn't work and doing an ant clean in front didn't fix it either. Updating to a
revision i knew did work also failed.
I just rem
help me out of this error:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/solr/util/plugin/SolrCoreAware
Hi,
I think the exception is caused by the fact that you're trying to use the
latest version of Carrot2 with Solr 1.4.x. There are two alternative
solutions here:
* as described in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ClusteringComponent,
invoke "ant get-libraries"
to get the compatible JAR files.
or
*
Hi,
Can anyone help me to solve the error:
Class org.carrot2.util.pool.SoftUnboundedPool does not implement the
requested interface org.carrot2.util.pool.IParameterizedPool
at
org.carrot2.core.PoolingProcessingComponentManager.(PoolingProcessingComponentManager.java:77)
at
org.c
r-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, January 18, 2011 1:54:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Carrot2 clustering component
>
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011 11:12 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> > Isha,
> >
> > You'll get more and better help if you provide more details about what you
>ha
/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search ::http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Isha Garg
To:solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, January 18, 2011 12:38:03 AM
Subject: Carrot2 clustering component
Hi,
I am not able to understand the caarot2 clustering
p://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Isha Garg
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, January 18, 2011 12:38:03 AM
> Subject: Carrot2 clustering component
>
> Hi,
>I am not able to understand the caarot2 clustering component from
&
Hi,
I am not able to understand the caarot2 clustering component from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ClusteringComponent
please provide me more detailed information if someone had already worked on
this. How to run this and use this during search query.
Thanks!
Isha
Hi,
Please tell me how can I get the libraries and plugins for
carrot2 clustering component in solr1.4.Tell me the site from where i
can get them.
Thanks!
Isha
Yes, that's the approach I'm taking right now. I do a lookup the doc
ids in the resultset to find the matching document.
I can live with the manual lookup, I wanted to see if it would be
possible to pick a custom field to represent the document in the docs
array.
Thanks for contributing the
> The solr schema has the fields, id, name and desc.
>
> I would like to get docs:["name Field here" ] instead of the doc Id
> field as in
> "docs":["200066", "195650",
>
The idea behind using the document ids was that based on them you could
access the individual documents' content, inc
The solr schema has the fields, id, name and desc.
I would like to get docs:["name Field here" ] instead of the doc Id
field as in
"docs":["200066", "195650",
On Wednesday, August 18, 2010, Stanislaw Osinski
wrote:
> Hi Tommy,
>
>
Hi Tommy,
I'm using the clustering component with solr 1.4.
>
> The response is given by the id field in the doc array like:
>"labels":["Devices"],
>"docs":["200066",
> "195650",
> &quo
I'm using the clustering component with solr 1.4.
The response is given by the id field in the doc array like:
"labels":["Devices"],
"docs":["200066",
"195650",
"204850",
Is there a way to cha
Hey thanks Stanislaw! I'm going to try this against the current trunk
tonight and see what happens.
Matt
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Stanislaw Osinski <
stanislaw.osin...@carrotsearch.com> wrote:
> > The patch should also work with trunk, but I haven't verified it yet.
> >
>
> I've just add
> The patch should also work with trunk, but I haven't verified it yet.
>
I've just added a patch against solr trunk to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1804.
S.
Hi Matt,
I'm attempting to get the carrot based clustering component (in trunk) to
> work. I see that the clustering contrib has been disabled for the time
> being. Does anyone know if this will be re-enabled soon, or even better,
> know how I could get it working as it is?
&g
Hi,
I'm attempting to get the carrot based clustering component (in trunk) to
work. I see that the clustering contrib has been disabled for the time
being. Does anyone know if this will be re-enabled soon, or even better,
know how I could get it working as it is?
Thanks,
Matt
: How do we combine clustering component and Dismax query handler?
The dismax *handler* is now just the SearchHandler with defType=dismax ...
so if you follow the examples for setting up the clustering component on
an instance of SearchHandler, all you have to do is configure that
instance to
Hi,
How do we combine clustering component and Dismax query handler?
Regards,
allahbaksh
41 matches
Mail list logo