On 10/27/2011 9:14 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Well, this could be explained if your fields are very short. Norms
are encoded into (part of?) a byte, so your ranking may be unaffected.
Try adding debugQuery=on and looking at the explanation. If you've
really omitted norms, I think you should see c
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> we are not actively removing norms. if you set omitNorms=true and
>> index documents they won't have norms for this field. Yet, other
>> segment still have norms until they get merg
Well, this could be explained if your fields are very short. Norms
are encoded into (part of?) a byte, so your ranking may be unaffected.
Try adding debugQuery=on and looking at the explanation. If you've
really omitted norms, I think you should see clauses like:
1.0 = fieldNorm(field=features, d
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> we are not actively removing norms. if you set omitNorms=true and
> index documents they won't have norms for this field. Yet, other
> segment still have norms until they get merged with a segment that has
> no norms for that field ie. omit
eld are you changing the norms? (You just will see
> changes in text fields)
> Using debugQuery=true you can see how norms affect the score (in case you
> have them not omited)
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/changing-omitNorms-on-
message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/changing-omitNorms-on-an-already-built-index-tp3459132p3459169.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
So Solr 1.4. I decided I wanted to change a field to have
omitNorms=true that didn't previously.
So I changed the schema to have omitNorms=true. And I reindexed all
documents.
But it seems to have had absolutely no effect. All relevancy rankings
seem to be the same.
Now, I could have a m
