Brian Whitman wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Hey Brian, I didn't catch what OS you are using on EC2 by the way. I
thought most UNIX OS's were using memory overcommit - A quick search brings
up Linux, AIX, and HP-UX, and maybe even OSX?
What are you running over t
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Hey Brian, I didn't catch what OS you are using on EC2 by the way. I
> thought most UNIX OS's were using memory overcommit - A quick search brings
> up Linux, AIX, and HP-UX, and maybe even OSX?
>
> What are you running over there? EC2, so Linu
Hey Brian, I didn't catch what OS you are using on EC2 by the way. I
thought most UNIX OS's were using memory overcommit - A quick search
brings up Linux, AIX, and HP-UX, and maybe even OSX?
What are you running over there? EC2, so Linux I assume?
Yonik: I take it, now that Linux uses copy on
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Forking for a small script on something that can have such a large memory
footprint is just a huge waste of resources. Ideally you might have a tiny
program running, listening on a socket or something, and it can be alert
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Forking for a small script on something that can have such a large memory
> footprint is just a huge waste of resources. Ideally you might have a tiny
> program running, listening on a socket or something, and it can be alerted
> and do the actu
Your right, its nasty, but its how Fork works. I would say its something
that should be fixed, its so nasty, but with the new all Java
replication, its probably a moot point.
Forking for a small script on something that can have such a large
memory footprint is just a huge waste of resources.
gt; Subject: Re: cannot allocate memory for snapshooter
>
> Thanks for the pointer. (It seems really weird to alloc 5GB of swap just
> because the JVM needs to run a shell script.. but I get hoss's explanation
> in the following post)
>
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:37
Thanks for the pointer. (It seems really weird to alloc 5GB of swap just
because the JVM needs to run a shell script.. but I get hoss's explanation
in the following post)
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Bill Au wrote:
> add more swap space:
> http://www.nabble.com/Not-enough-space-to11423199.htm
: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, January 2, 2009 10:52:59 AM
> Subject: cannot allocate memory for snapshooter
>
> I have an indexing machine on a test server (a mid-level EC2 instance, 8GB
> of RAM) and I run jetty like:
>
> java -server -Xms5g -
add more swap space:
http://www.nabble.com/Not-enough-space-to11423199.html#a11424938
Bill
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Brian Whitman wrote:
> I have an indexing machine on a test server (a mid-level EC2 instance, 8GB
> of RAM) and I run jetty like:
>
> java -server -Xms5g -Xmx5g -XX:MaxPer
I have an indexing machine on a test server (a mid-level EC2 instance, 8GB
of RAM) and I run jetty like:
java -server -Xms5g -Xmx5g -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
-XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/tmp/heap
-Dsolr.solr.home=/vol/solr -Djava.awt.headless=true -jar start.jar
The indexing maste
11 matches
Mail list logo