l wanted to
make sure I'm not missing s.th. obvious here. I guess making the copyFields
recursive does rise quite some questions, and doesn't really justify the
hassle, just for not having to copy the 10 lines ;-)
Thx for your explanation,
Axel
--
View this message in context:
http://w
: I recently discovered that the copyFields directive exclusively works for
: copying fields from the input doc to the indexed/stored doc.
correct. you have to explicitly list the mappings, it's not recursive (as
i recall this was done partially because it was easier, but also because
it ensur
Batzenmann wrote:
>
> cahining
>
and meant: 'chaining' -
sry for spamming,
Axel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/cahining-copyFields-tp19839265p19839530.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
all input on "b" with the
trimmedString or the grandVoodoo analyzer..
thanks, Axel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/cahining-copyFields-tp19839265p19839265.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
