;t get the documents with
default score equal to 1.0
-Original Message-
From: Raboah, Avi [mailto:avi.rab...@verint.com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2019 2:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Edismax bq(boost query) with filter range on score
I am using solr 7.6.0 and I try to
I am using solr 7.6.0 and I try to check the incl and incu I get the same
result for true or false
-Original Message-
From: Paras Lehana [mailto:paras.leh...@indiamart.com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2019 1:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax bq(boost query) with
ore between (1.0 < score < 4.0) although
> lower bound equal to 0.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Paras Lehana [mailto:paras.leh...@indiamart.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2019 11:51 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Edi
bq)&q=*:*&rows=2000
I get all the documents with score between (1.0 < score < 4.0) although lower
bound equal to 0.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Paras Lehana [mailto:paras.leh...@indiamart.com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2019 11:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
December 09, 2019 7:08 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Edismax bq(boost query) with filter range on score
>
> Hi Raboah,
>
> What do you mean by filter range? Please post expected result. Do you want
> to put an fq on the score?
>
> On Sun, 8 Dec 201
r 09, 2019 7:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Edismax bq(boost query) with filter range on score
Hi Raboah,
What do you mean by filter range? Please post expected result. Do you want to
put an fq on the score?
On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 17:54, Raboah, Avi wrote:
> Hi,
>
&
Hi Raboah,
What do you mean by filter range? Please post expected result. Do you want
to put an fq on the score?
On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 17:54, Raboah, Avi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to use solr boost mechanism for specific text I use the bq field
> under deftype=edisMax.
>
> For example -
> q=*:*
Hi,
In order to use solr boost mechanism for specific text I use the bq field under
deftype=edisMax.
For example -
q=*:*&deftype=edisMax&bq=text:"phrase"^3&fl=*,score
after I do this query I get the relevant documents boosted with the solr
calculation score.
Now my question is there a way to d
I didn't see any response so I wanted to check if my observation simply is not
relevant for other people or if I missed to provide any required details.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
Date: 05/09/2019 08:28 AM
Subject: Negative boost query (bq) with edismax for lower scores with Solr
I find that the edismax boost query implementation is not quite logical. It
does not allow selectively decreasing the relevancy score anymore.
E.g. bq=color:red^2 can be added to increase the score of matching documents.
But how can I decrease the score for documents with color:red? Before Solr
Only way to know is to try! ;)
You have a typo on “noika”.I’d use ‘bf’ instead of bq so as to specify the
function without the _val_ stuff.
Erik
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 02:19, Midas A wrote:
>
> Thanks Erik.
> Please confirm
> if keyword = "nokia"
> *bq=_val_:%22payload(vals_dpf,noika)%
Thanks Erik.
Please confirm
if keyword = "nokia"
*bq=_val_:%22payload(vals_dpf,noika)%22&defType=edismax*
*wil this query work for me ?.*
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:12 PM Erik Hatcher wrote:
> This blog I wrote will help. Let us know how it goes.
>
> https://lucidworks.com/2017/09/14/s
This blog I wrote will help. Let us know how it goes.
https://lucidworks.com/2017/09/14/solr-payloads/
Erik
> On Dec 7, 2018, at 01:31, Midas A wrote:
>
> I have a field at my schema named *val_dpf* . I want that *val_dpf* should
> have payloaded values. i.e.
>
> noika|0.46
I have a field at my schema named *val_dpf* . I want that *val_dpf* should
have payloaded values. i.e.
noika|0.46 mobile|0.37 samsung|0.19 redmi|0.22
When a user searches for a keyword i.e. nokia I want to add 0.46 to usual
score. If user searches for samsung, 0.19 should be added .
how can i
ode:"B"
> > },
> > {
> > topic_code:"A"
> > },
> > {
> > topic_code:"A"
> > },
> > {
> > topic_code:"C"
> > },
> > {
> > topic_code:"A"
> > },..
> > now i want to get respanse from
> },..
> now i want to get respanse from a solr 100 dosuments , and i want to have
> 70 document with topic_code:A and 10 documents with topic_code:B and 20
> document with topic_code:C.
> so i guess i need SOLR BOOST QUERY.
> some thing like this :
> q=(topic_code:A)^70 OR (topic_code:B)^20 OR (topic_code:C)^10 & row=100
> but this isn't work.
> could u help me to create a suitable query and get my best result ?
> tnx.
de:"A"
},..
now i want to get respanse from a solr 100 dosuments , and i want to have
70 document with topic_code:A and 10 documents with topic_code:B and 20
document with topic_code:C.
so i guess i need SOLR BOOST QUERY.
some thing like this :
q=(topic_code:A)^70 OR (topic_code:B)^20 OR (top
My bad. Thanks, Erik.
Gin
Best Wishes,
Gintautas Sulskus
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Now you're asking a dismax parser question. dismax does not support * or
> *:* directly, but rather in q.alt if the query is empty.
>
>Erik
>
> > On Nov 1, 2016, at 11:15, Gintau
Now you're asking a dismax parser question. dismax does not support * or *:*
directly, but rather in q.alt if the query is empty.
Erik
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 11:15, Gintautas Sulskus
> wrote:
>
> I store date as Long:
>
>
> positionIncrementGap="0"/>
>
> Eric, at first glance it seems
I store date as Long:
Eric, at first glance it seems that your given advice to separate nested
parsers worked.
I can see the query in the logs and it returns the expected data.
Thanks!
Using the same opportunity:
How do I set $term to match everything in qq={!dismax qf=‘….’ v=$term},
e.g. lik
What’s the field and type definition of submit_date? Could that be the issue?
Also, one thing you could do is separate the nested parsers like this:
q={!boost b=… v=$qq}
qq={!dismax qf=‘….’ v=$term}
Relying on `v` to be the string after the closing curly bracket is sometimes
error-pro
31st October 2016 21:19
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Getting NullPointerException in an attempt to boost query
> result by date
> >
> > Hi Erik,
> >
> > I have defined the query as SearchHandler:
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
ene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting NullPointerException in an attempt to boost query result
> by date
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> I have defined the query as SearchHandler:
>
>
>
>
> {!boost b=recip(ms(NOW/HOUR, submit_date),3.16e-11,1,1)}
>
Hi Erik,
I have defined the query as SearchHandler:
{!boost b=recip(ms(NOW/HOUR, submit_date),3.16e-11,1,1)}
{!type=dismax qf='title^10 body^5 body^1' v=$term}
The handler is then invoked with the following url:
/solr/core/testSearch?term=apple
The handler works i
how’d you set “$term” - the correct way would be &term=apple on the Solr
request.
> On Oct 31, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Gintautas Sulskus
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to construct a timestamp-boosted query comprising two weighted
> fields: "title" and "body":
>
> {!boost b=recip(ms(NOW/HOUR,su
Hi,
I am trying to construct a timestamp-boosted query comprising two weighted
fields: "title" and "body":
{!boost b=recip(ms(NOW/HOUR,submit_date),3.16e-11,1,1)}
{!type=dismax qf='title^10 body^1' v=$term}
$term=apple
I expect the given example query provided above to search fields "title"
and
your ranking.
Regards,
- Mensaje original -
De: "Edward P"
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Enviados: Sábado, 20 de Febrero 2016 17:56:52
Asunto: [MASSMAIL]Re: How to boost query based on result of subquery?
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for the input but this does not directly address
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for the input but this does not directly address my problem.
Currently I am not having an issue with loading the "position" values into
my documents. They are indexed as regular fields with the rest of the
document.
It is a good tip about ExternalFileField. I might use that later
Hi Ed,
Did you look into ExternalFilefield type (for ex: with name ::
position_external_field in your schema), which can be used to map to your
field (for ex position, hope these are not changed very often) and then use
position_external_field in your boost function.
This can be used if you can
Hello,
I am using Solr 5.4.0, one collection, multiple shards with replication.
Sample documents:
{
"item_id": "30d1e667",
"date": "2014-01-01",
"position": "5",
"description": "automobile license plate holder"
}
{
"item_id": "3cf18028",
"date": "2013-01-01",
"position": "23",
"description": "din
: Boost Query (bq) accepts lucene queries. E.g. bq=price:[50 TO 100]^100
: boost and bf parameters accept Function queries, e.g. boost=log(popularity)
while these statements are both true, they don't tell the full story.
for example you can also specify a function as a query usin
Hi Sara,
Boost Query (bq) accepts lucene queries. E.g. bq=price:[50 TO 100]^100
boost and bf parameters accept Function queries, e.g. boost=log(popularity)
Ahmet
On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:41 PM, Binoy Dalal
wrote:
You use boost functions when you wish to perform certain operations
suri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Both the query affect solr scoring but for relevancy we use boost query as
> we can provide additional weights to a boost query but not to a function
> query.
>
>
>
> -
> Regards
> Shruti
> --
> View this message in context:
>
Hi,
Both the query affect solr scoring but for relevancy we use boost query as
we can provide additional weights to a boost query but not to a function
query.
-
Regards
Shruti
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boost-query-vs-function-query-in-edismax
Hi all as I underestood.
Both of them are for affecting on relevence scoring.but u have more
dominate on relevence scoring when using boosted query.is it true?
I am willing to understand more about difference between 2.
And know what is best situation for using each other?
Tnx.
> ehehe your request is kinda delicate :
> > 1) I can't store the
> > payload at index time
> > 2) Passing all the weights at query time is not an option
> >
> > So you seem to exclude all the possible solutions ...
> > Anyway, just thinking loud, have you
ndex time
> 2) Passing all the weights at query time is not an option
>
> So you seem to exclude all the possible solutions ...
> Anyway, just thinking loud, have you tried the edismax query parser and the
> boost query feature?
>
> 1) the first strategy is the one you would pref
ehehe your request is kinda delicate :
1) I can't store the
payload at index time
2) Passing all the weights at query time is not an option
So you seem to exclude all the possible solutions ...
Anyway, just thinking loud, have you tried the edismax query parser and the
boost query featur
Hi all,
I am working on a mechanism that applies additional boosts to documents
according to the role covered by the author. For instance we have
CEO|5 Architect|3 Developer|1 TeamLeader|2
keeping in mind that an author could cover multiple roles (e.g. for a
design document, a Team Leader could b
Thanks a lot Jack, it makes total sense. I check the config and default q.op
was set to OR, which was influencing the query.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boost-Query-bq-syntax-usage-tp4161989p4162169.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
dismax and then specify edismax for bq using the localParam notation.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Boost Query (bq) syntax/usage
The "+" signs in the parsed b
The "+" signs in the parsed boost query indicated the terms were ANDed
together, but maybe you can use the q.op and mm parameters to change the
default operator (I forget!).
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: shamik
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:19 PM
To:
.n3.nabble.com/Boost-Query-bq-syntax-usage-tp4161989p4161994.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
nts that contain all three of
the terms rather than any of the three terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: shamik
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Boost Query (bq) syntax/usage
Hi,
I'm little confused with the right
Hi,
I'm little confused with the right syntax of defining boost queries. If I
use them in the following way:
http://localhost:8983/solr/testhandler?q=Application+Manager&bq=(Source2:sfdc^6
Source2:downloads^5 Source2:topics^3)&debugQuery=true
it gets translated to -->
+Source2:sfd
rce2:sfdc^6.0
Source2:downloads^5.0
Source2:topics^3.0
Both queries generate different result in terms of relevancy. Just wondering
what is the right way of using bq ?
-Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Boost-Query-bq-syntax-usage-tp4161988.htm
All of them work like a charm! Thanks, Chris.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : But this query does not work:
> :
> : q={!boost
> : b=if(exists(query({!v='user_type:ADMIN'})),10,1)}id:1&rows=1&fl=*,score
> : It gives an error like this:
>
> The problem is the way you a
: But this query does not work:
:
: q={!boost
: b=if(exists(query({!v='user_type:ADMIN'})),10,1)}id:1&rows=1&fl=*,score
: It gives an error like this:
The problem is the way you are trying to nest queries inside of each other
w/o any sort of quoting -- the parser has no indication that the "b"
The Solr function query documentation (
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#exists) says:
exists(query({!v='year:2012'})) will return true for docs with year=2012
I have a document like:
{
id: 1,
user_type: ADMIN,
like_score: 1
}
id, user_type and like_score are all indexed and stor
gy.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:58 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Boost Query Example
>
> Add debugQuery=true to your queries and look at the scoring in the "explain"
> section. From the intermediate scoring by field, you should be ab
al Message-
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service-Solutions)
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; michael.della.bi...@appinions.com
Subject: RE: Boost Query Example
Hi Michael, Thanks for the information.
Now I am trying with the query , bu
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service-Solutions)
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; michael.della.bi...@appinions.com
Subject: RE: Boost Query Example
Hi Michael, Thanks for the information.
Now I am trying with the query , but I am n
ache.org
Subject: Re: Boost Query Example
Hi,
Filter queries don't affect score, so boosting won't have an effect there.
If you want those query terms to get boosted, move them into the q parameter.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq
Hope that helps!
Michael Della B
Hi,
Filter queries don't affect score, so boosting won't have an effect there.
If you want those query terms to get boosted, move them into the q
parameter.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq
Hope that helps!
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062
app
Hi can some one help me on the Boost & Sort query example.
http://localhost:8983/solr/
ProductCollection/select?q=*%3A*&wt=json&indent=true&fq=SKU:223-CL10V3^100 OR
SKU:223-CL1^90
There is not different in the query Order, Let me know if I am missing
something. Also I like to Order with the e
final boost query will be.
For now I will try to avoid using dismax and will continue to play around with
it.
Thanks again,
Will
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 7:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Boost
grant,institution,investigator,investigatoraffiliation,keywordheading,keywords,nlmjournalname,origtitle,otherabstract,personname,primaryauthor,protocolconcept,spaceflight,substance,title
> product(10,query({!dismax qf="title"
> v="treatment"},0))
> true
>
013 8:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Boost query parameter with Lucid parser and using query
FunctionQuery
Why would you use dismax for the query() when you want to match a simple term
to one field?
If you share &echoParams=all the answer may lie somewhere therein?
--
Jan
0:07 skrev "Miller, Will Jr" :
> I have been playing around with the bq/bf/boost query parameters available in
> dismax/edismax. I am using the Lucid parser as my default parser for the
> query. The lucid parser is an extension of the DisMax parser and should
> contain ev
Subject: Boost query parameter with Lucid parser and using query
FunctionQuery
I have been playing around with the bq/bf/boost query parameters available
in dismax/edismax. I am using the Lucid parser as my default parser for the
query. The lucid parser is an extension of the DisMax parser and
I have been playing around with the bq/bf/boost query parameters available in
dismax/edismax. I am using the Lucid parser as my default parser for the query.
The lucid parser is an extension of the DisMax parser and should contain
everything that is available in that parser. My goal is boost
.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-boost-query-term-after-tokenizer-tp4010889p4014245.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thank you . Hoss
Tokenization is not a problem in english,but in some other languages like
chinese, there are no space to seperate each term in article.Lt is a long
string like this “AABCDAEFSABS”,in which “AA” and "BCD" ...represent a
meaningful term ,so l want to boost some special and meaningful
: if the query word is "ABCD",then after being tokenized it is "A" "BC" "D" ,
: l want to boost term "BC" ,so the query word is like this: "A BC^10 D" and
: phrase query "ABCD" . all query words users typing in will be processed
: like that automaticly.
it's not really clear from your example how
if the query word is "ABCD",then after being tokenized it is "A" "BC" "D" ,
l want to boost term "BC" ,so the query word is like this: "A BC^10 D" and
phrase query "ABCD" . all query words users typing in will be processed
like that automaticly.
l guess l can custom a filter to do it ,but l don't k
if the query word is "ABCD",then after being tokenized it is "A" "BC" "D" ,
l want to boost term "BC" ,so the query word is like this: "A BC^10 D" and
phrase query "ABCD" . all query words users typing in will be processed
like that automaticly.
l guess l can custom a filter to do it ,but l don't k
I tried that, didn't seem to affect anything.
I think it only works between fields and not within a field.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Marc SCHNEIDER
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe you could have a look at this :
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#tie_.28Tie_breaker.29
>
> Marc.
>
> O
Hi,
Maybe you could have a look at this :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin#tie_.28Tie_breaker.29
Marc.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:48 PM, John wrote:
> I have a complex edismax query:
>
>
> facet=true&facet.mincount=0&qf=title^0.08+categorysearch^0.05+abstract^0.03+body^0.1&wt=java
I have a complex edismax query:
facet=true&facet.mincount=0&qf=title^0.08+categorysearch^0.05+abstract^0.03+body^0.1&wt=javabin&rows=25&defType=edismax&version=2&omitHeader=true&fl=*,score&bq=eqid:(3yp^1.57+OR+5fi^1.55+OR+c1s^1.55+OR+3ym^1.55+OR+gjz^1.55...)&start=0&q=*:*&facet.field=category&face
: 1. Each piece is still subject to the IDF component of the score,
: requiring me to make each individual category have a boost factoring
: that in. For example, if I want meta:promote to be twice as boosted as
: category:featured, I can't simply boost the first to 2 and the second to
: 1 (t
On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> one of the original use cases for bq was for artificial keyword boosting,
> in which case it still comes in handy...
>
> bq=meta:promote^100 text:new^10 category:featured^100 (*:*
> -category:accessories)^10
Yeah I thought of this specific
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> We aren't yet using dismax in production, but I've had it in my config for a
> while now. I've changed it to edismax in the 3.1 setup I'm putting together
> now. It has the following in the bf parameter:
>
> recip(ms(NOW/DAY,pd),3.16e-11,1,1
On 4/5/2011 1:17 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
the "boost" param of edismax is probably a lot better choice then either
bq/bf -- but it really depends on wether you want an additive boost or a
multiplicitive one (of course with teh function query syntax add(),
product() and (query() can be combined
-function query
: (i.e. use the lucene query parser).
one of the original use cases for bq was for artificial keyword boosting,
in which case it still comes in handy...
bq=meta:promote^100 text:new^10 category:featured^100 (*:*
-category:accessories)^10
: Also, you can basically get the same af
As I was reviewing the boosting capabilities of the dismax & edismax query
parsers, it's not clear to me that the "boost query" has much use. The value
of boost functions, particularly with a multiplied boost that edismax supports,
is very clear -- there are a variety of
lucene/solr parser is able to parse
prefix query. Is the intended usage with dismax parser?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-run-boost-query-for-non-dismax-query-parser-tp2723442p2727566.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Thanks for your reply. yeah, an additional query with
> the boost value will
> work.
>
> However, I just wonder where you get the information that
> BoostQParserPlugin
> only handles function query?
>
> I looked up the javadoc, and still can't get that.
> This is the javadoc.
>
>
> Create a
p://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-run-boost-query-for-non-dismax-query-parser-tp2723442p2726422.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> I need to code some boosting logic when some field equal to
> some value. I
> was able to get it work if using dismax query parser.
> However, since the
> solr query will need to handle prefix or fuzzy query,
> therefore, dismax
> query parser is not really my choice.
>
> Therefore, i want
2.2&start=0&rows=10&fl=*%2Cscore&wt=standard&defType=dismax&qf=title_name_en_US&q=*%3A*&bq=genres%3A56^100&debugQuery=on
>
>
> But from debug i can tell it confuse the boost query
> parameter as part of
> query string:
>
> lst name="debug&qu
g the instruction on this page although the instruction
there is really to implement a boost function, instead of boosting query.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_boost_the_score_of_newer_documents
Thanks for your help,
cy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472
smax&qf=title_name_en_US&q=*%3A*&bq=genres%3A56^100&debugQuery=on
But from debug i can tell it confuse the boost query parameter as part of
query string:
lst name="debug">
str name="rawquerystring">*:*
str name="querystring">*:*
str name=&qu
I have a field "popularity" that is changing frequently. So I'd like to put it
in an ExternalFileField.
If I do that, can I still use "popularity" in a boosted query such as:
{!boost b=log(popularity)}foo
Thanks.
: Special characters in the text used for boost queries are not removed. For
: example, bq=field1:(what is xyz?)^10 gets parsed into query field1:xyz?10
: (what and is are stop words). Question mark didn't get removed -- field1
: uses standard tokenizer and standard filter, so I expect it to get r
Hi,
Special characters in the text used for boost queries are not removed. For
example, bq=field1:(what is xyz?)^10 gets parsed into query field1:xyz?10
(what and is are stop words). Question mark didn't get removed -- field1
uses standard tokenizer and standard filter, so I expect it to get remov
iew this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Impossible-Boost-Query-tp472080p580214.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Ok so this is basically just a random sort.
Anyway I can get this to randomly sort documents that closely related and
not the rest of the results?
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Impossible-Boost-Query-tp472080p580214.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
; Any instructions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You'd likely want to get the latest patch and trunk and try applying.
>>>>>
>>>>
gt;>
>>>
>>> Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You'd likely want to get the latest patch and trunk and try applying.
>>>>
>>>> Otis
>>>>
>>>> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - N
nk and try applying.
>>>
>>> Otis
>>>
>>> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
>>> Hadoop ecosystem search :: http://search-hadoop.com/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message
>>>>
- Original Message
>>> From: blargy
>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 6:10:22 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Impossible Boost Query?
>>>
>>>
>> Maybe a better question is... how can I install this and will it work
&
apache.org
>> Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 6:10:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: Impossible Boost Query?
>>
>>
> Maybe a better question is... how can I install this and will it work
>> with
> 1.4?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> blargy wrote:
>>
>> Pos
Tue, March 23, 2010 6:10:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Impossible Boost Query?
>
>
Maybe a better question is... how can I install this and will it work
> with
1.4?
Thanks
blargy wrote:
>
> Possibly.
> How can I install this as a contrib or do I need to actually
> perform the
&
;> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 2:39:48 PM
>>> Subject: Impossible Boost Query?
>>>
>>>
>> I was wondering if this is even possible. I'll try to explain what I'm
>>> trying
>> to do to the best of
arch :: http://search-hadoop.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: blargy
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Tue, March 23, 2010 2:39:48 PM
>> Subject: Impossible Boost Query?
>>
>>
> I was wondering if this is even pos
:39:48 PM
> Subject: Impossible Boost Query?
>
>
I was wondering if this is even possible. I'll try to explain what I'm
> trying
to do to the best of my ability.
Ok, so our site has a bunch
> of products that are sold by any number of
sellers. Currently when I search
lts across sellers (given each seller a fair shot to
sell their goods).
Is there any way to add some boost query for example that will start
weighing products lower when their seller has already been listed a few
times. For example, right now I have
Product foo by Seller A
Product foo by Seller A
Prod
No, the reverse is true. Sorting is very very fast in Lucene. The
first sort operation spends a lot of time making a data structure and
then following sort calls use it.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Anil Cherian
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I just now tried a sorting on the results and I got the re
Hi David,
I just now tried a sorting on the results and I got the records with latest
approval_dt first.
My question now is will index-time boosting method increase the response. ie
will I be able to acheive the same thing i achieved
using sorting much faster if i use index-time boosting.
If you
Hi David,
Thank you for the mail.
It seems you are right.sorting might solve the issue as it is not giving
any special weightage to any record other than its approval_dt is the latest
one.. I think i am convinced for now.
I am eagerly waiting for your book around thanks giving so taht i can
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
