Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-15 Thread Damien Kamerman
Sounds like 64bit is OK. Would be work re-testing that G1GC assert trip with the latest JDK. On 14 March 2015 at 01:46, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 3/12/2015 5:11 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > > Hello - i would assume off-heap would out perform any heap based data > structure. G1 is only useful if you

Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-13 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 3/12/2015 5:11 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > Hello - i would assume off-heap would out perform any heap based data > structure. G1 is only useful if you deal with very large heaps, and it eats > CPU at the same time. As much as G1 is better than CMS in same cases, you > would still have less was

RE: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-12 Thread Markus Jelsma
. if someone has a setup at hand to provide details, please do :) -Original message- > From:Damien Kamerman > Sent: Friday 13th March 2015 0:02 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr > > Are there any results of off-heap c

Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-12 Thread Damien Kamerman
Original message- > >> From:Yonik Seeley > >> Sent: Monday 9th March 2015 19:53 > >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr > >> > >> Thanks everyone for voting! > >> > >> Result

Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-09 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
PMC thinks about it :) > > Cheers, > M. > > -Original message- >> From:Yonik Seeley >> Sent: Monday 9th March 2015 19:53 >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr >> >> Thanks everyone for voting!

RE: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-09 Thread Markus Jelsma
Monday 9th March 2015 19:53 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr > > Thanks everyone for voting! > > Result charts (note that these auto-generated charts don't show blanks > as equivalent to "0") > https:

Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-09 Thread Yonik Seeley
Thanks everyone for voting! Result charts (note that these auto-generated charts don't show blanks as equivalent to "0") https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1gaMpNpHVdquA3q75yiFhqZhAWdWB-K6N8Jh3dBbWAU8/viewanalytics Raw results spreadsheet (correlations can be interesting), and percentages at the bot

Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-01 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi Yonik, > > Now that you joined Cloudera, why not everything? Everything is on the table, but from a practical point of view I wanted to verify areas of user interest/support before doing the work to get things back. Even when there is

Re: backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-01 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Hi Yonik, Now that you joined Cloudera, why not everything? Otis -- Monitoring * Alerting * Anomaly Detection * Centralized Log Management Solr & Elasticsearch Support * http://sematext.com/ On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > As many of you know, I've been doing some work i

backport Heliosearch features to Solr

2015-03-01 Thread Yonik Seeley
As many of you know, I've been doing some work in the experimental "heliosearch" fork of Solr over the past year. I think it's time to bring some more of those changes back. So here's a poll: Which Heliosearch features do you think should be brought back to Apache Solr? http://bit.ly/1E7wi1Q (li