of your term ( tempus -> tempvs , so tempvs will be in the index) .
> Of course this means that you will treat effectively tempus and tempvs as
> the same thing.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.
> nabble.com/allograph-ma
normalised
version of your term ( tempus -> tempvs , so tempvs will be in the index) .
Of course this means that you will treat effectively tempus and tempvs as
the same thing.
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/allograph-matching-tp4317807p4317835.h
Thanks Alessandro,
I didn't know about that CharFilterFactory, and in a first quick test it
behaves well.
I have to check what happens with highlights, term count and the like, but
at least I have a trail :)
Cheers,
Danilo
derstand if my proposed solution make
sense ina general sense.
Cheers
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/CharFilterFactories
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/allograph-matching-tp4317807p4317812.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
we have some latin documents indexed in SOLR which we'd like to search
through using allographs as well.
This means that, as there have been different ways to write the same
letters over the time, we can now have the same word written using
different letters.
This specifically resolves i
