garthgr...@averyranchconsulting.com> wrote:
> Thanks Mark and Tim. My understanding has been upgraded.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:59 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Zookeeper down
Thanks Mark and Tim. My understanding has been upgraded.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Zookeeper down question
On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Timothy Potter wrote
On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> Good questions ... From my understanding, queries will work if Zk goes down
> but writes do not work w/o Zookeeper. This works because the clusterstate
> is cached on each node so Zookeeper doesn't participate directly in queries
> and indexin
Good questions ... From my understanding, queries will work if Zk goes down
but writes do not work w/o Zookeeper. This works because the clusterstate
is cached on each node so Zookeeper doesn't participate directly in queries
and indexing requests. Solr has to decide not to allow writes if it loses
Given a 4 solr node instance (i.e. 2 shards, 2 replicas per shard), and a
standalone zookeeper.
Correct me if any of my understanding is incorrect on the following:
If ZK goes down, most normal operations will still function, since my
understanding is that ZK isn't involved on a transaction by t
