ndernam"
>
> but no results?!
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26842359.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
9
andernam"
but no results?!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26842359.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
uot;/>
>
> protected="protwords.txt"/>
>
>
>
>
> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
> words="stopwords.txt"/>
>generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0"
> catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
>
> protected="protwords.txt"/>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26834096.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
t be possible,
if it finds a match?
here's the config (with WordDelimiterFactory still on:) hope it's not to
long
--
View this message in context:
htt
cant I use the wildcard expression?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26776651.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
text:
http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26776651.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
it says, the query "name0*" gets analyzed into "name" and "0" without the
*.
Is that the problem, that with my query "name0*" he is really searching for
"name0" which, doesn't exist?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Sim
hile indexing:
> W
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26748588.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Hey,
well, the field is stored as well as indexed, and these are the filters that
are used while indexing:
W
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26748588.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
x27;m getting the right result.
> But since, i think, SOLR stores the string also under "name01", why don't a
> get any result when searching for "name0*" oder "name0?"
>
> thanks for any help
> QBasti
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Simple-Wildcard-Search-Question-tp26747482p26747482.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
quot;name" or "01" oder
"name01", i'm getting the right result.
But since, i think, SOLR stores the string also under "name01", why don't a
get any result when searching for "name0*" oder "name0?"
thanks for any help
QBasti
--
View this
r "01" oder
"name01", i'm getting the right result.
But since, i think, SOLR stores the string also under "name01", why don't a
get any result when searching for "name0*" oder "name0?"
thanks for any help
QBasti
--
View this message
Norberto Meijome wrote:
ok well let's say that i can live without john/jon in the short term.
what i really need today is a case insensitive wildcard search with
literal matching (no fancy stemming. bobby is bobby, not bobbi.)
what are my options?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokeniz
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:23:14 -0700
Jon Drukman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok well let's say that i can live without john/jon in the short term.
> what i really need today is a case insensitive wildcard search with
> literal matching (no fancy stemming. bobby is bobby, not bobbi.)
>
> what ar
Erik Hatcher wrote:
No, because the original data is Bobby Gaza, so
Bobby* would match, but not bobby*. "string" type (in the example
schema, to be clear) does effectively no analysis, leaving the original
string indexed as-is, case and all.
[...]
stemming and wildcard term queries aren't
On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Jon,
You provided a lot of nice details, thanks for helping us help you :)
The one missing piece is the definition of the "text" field type.
In Solr's _example_ schema, "bobby" gets analyzed (stemmed) to
"bobbi"[1]. Whe
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Jon,
You provided a lot of nice details, thanks for helping us help you :)
The one missing piece is the definition of the "text" field type. In
Solr's _example_ schema, "bobby" gets analyzed (stemmed) to
"bobbi"[1]. When you query for bobby*, the query parser is not ru
Jon,
You provided a lot of nice details, thanks for helping us help you :)
The one missing piece is the definition of the "text" field type. In
Solr's _example_ schema, "bobby" gets analyzed (stemmed) to
"bobbi"[1]. When you query for bobby*, the query parser is not
running an analyzer
When I search with q=bobby I get the following record:
2008-06-23T07:06:40Z
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/117/...
9
Bobby Gaza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When I search with bobby* I get nothing.
When I search with steve* I get "Steve Ballmer" and "Steve Jobs"...
What's going on?
19 matches
Mail list logo
