Sounds good. Thank you for the synonym (definitely will work on this) and
padding suggestions.
- Todd
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Regex-Searching-with-Decimal-Fields-tp4206015p4206421.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
> index for autocompleting (and regular expressions). We can throw away the
> "contains" but will at least need the "starts with" behavior.
>
> - Todd
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Rege
the numeric-type but maintain an additional string
index for autocompleting (and regular expressions). We can throw away the
"contains" but will at least need the "starts with" behavior.
- Todd
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Rege
de of Solr, I'm just
> looking for any extraneous zeros and wildcards to get the exact value (e.g.
> 123.0) and OR'ing that with the original user input.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> - Todd
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://luce
now, outside of Solr, I'm just
looking for any extraneous zeros and wildcards to get the exact value (e.g.
123.0) and OR'ing that with the original user input.
Thank you for your help.
- Todd
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-
e of search was being
> done (i.e. regex or not). The regex query input did not include the
> surrounding forward slashes.
>
> - Todd
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Regex-Searching-with-Decimal-Fields-tp4206015p4206155.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
7;t distinguish what type of search was being
done (i.e. regex or not). The regex query input did not include the
surrounding forward slashes.
- Todd
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Regex-Searching-with-Decimal-Fields-tp4206015p4206155.html
Sent from
t; Erick Erickson wrote
>> You could simply inject "synonyms" without the .0 in the same field
>> though.
>
> Using a SynonymFilterFactory? If so, can this be done dynamically as I won't
> know the "numeric" (I guess we can call them string) values.
>
>
>
.0 in the same field
> though.
Using a SynonymFilterFactory? If so, can this be done dynamically as I won't
know the "numeric" (I guess we can call them string) values.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Regex-Searching-with-Decimal-Fields-tp4206015p4206050.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
know if I can provide any additional details. Thanks for the
> help!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Regex-Searching-with-Decimal-Fields-tp4206015.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t to just create another
> field type that removes the dot zero?
>
> e.g. /23[58]/ (will not match on 235.0)
>
> Please let me know if I can provide any additional details. Thanks for the
> help!
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Regex-Searching-with-Decimal-Fields-tp4206015.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
an provide any additional details. Thanks for the
help!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wildcard-Regex-Searching-with-Decimal-Fields-tp4206015.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12 matches
Mail list logo