Re: Which caches should use the solr.FastLRUCache

che may be faster, unless you have >> a ton of CPUs... not sure where the crossover point is though. >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com >> >> > > -- > View this message in context:

Re: Which caches should use the solr.FastLRUCache

sure where the crossover point is though. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-caches-should-use-the-solr.FastLRUCache-tp23860182p23874898.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Which caches should use the solr.FastLRUCache

2009/6/4 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् : > FastLRUCache is designed to be lock free so it is well suited for > caches which are hit several times in a request. I guess there is no > harm in using FastLRUCache across all the caches. Gets are cheaper, but evictions are more expensive. If the cache hit

Re: Which caches should use the solr.FastLRUCache

which caches (filterCache, queryResultCache, > documentCache, fieldValueCache) should be implemented using the > solr.FastLRUCache in solr 1.4 and what are the pros & cons > vs the solr.LRUCache. > > Thanks Robert. > -- > View this message in context: > http://ww

Which caches should use the solr.FastLRUCache

http://www.nabble.com/Which-caches-should-use-the-solr.FastLRUCache-tp23860182p23860182.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.