Thank you very much...I shall try out the tokenizerFactory attribute on
SynonymFilterFactory
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I had to be brief as my facets are in the order of 100K over 800K
> documents
> : and also if I give the complete schema.xml I was afraid nob
: I had to be brief as my facets are in the order of 100K over 800K documents
: and also if I give the complete schema.xml I was afraid nobody would read my
: long message :-) ..Hence I showed only relevant pieces of the result showing
: different fields having same problem
relevant is good, but
Hello Mr.Hostetter,
Thank you for patiently reading through my post, I apologize for being
cryptic in my previous messages..
>>when you cut/pasted the facet output, you excluded the field names. based
>>on the schema & solrconfig.xml snippets you posted later, i'm assuming
>>they are usstate, and
A few comments about the info you've provided...
when you cut/pasted the facet output, you excluded the field names. based
on the schema & solrconfig.xml snippets you posted later, i'm assuming
they are usstate, and keyword, but you have to be explicit so that people can
help correlate the
r
Got it. Sorry for not having an answer for your problem.
On 10/06/2009 04:58 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
You dont see any facet fields in my query because I have configured them in
the solrconfig.xml to give specific fields as facets by default in the
dismax and standard handlers so that I dont have t
You dont see any facet fields in my query because I have configured them in
the solrconfig.xml to give specific fields as facets by default in the
dismax and standard handlers so that I dont have to specify all those fields
individually everytime I query, all I need to do is just set facet=true
tha
I am stumped then. I had a similar issue when I was using a field that
was being heavily tokenized, but I corrected the issue by using a
field(generated using copyField) that doesn't get analyzed at all.
On the query you provided before I didn't see the parameters to tell
solr for which field
Yes Exactly the same
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Christian Zambrano wrote:
> And you had the analyzer for that field set-up the same way as shown on
> your previous e-mail when you indexed the data?
>
>
>
>
> On 10/06/2009 03:46 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
>
>> I did infact check it out any there i
And you had the analyzer for that field set-up the same way as shown on
your previous e-mail when you indexed the data?
On 10/06/2009 03:46 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
I did infact check it out any there is no weirdness in analysis page...see
result below
Index Analyzer org.apache.solr.analysis.Ke
I did infact check it out any there is no weirdness in analysis page...see
result below
Index Analyzer org.apache.solr.analysis.KeywordTokenizerFactory {} term
position 1 term text New York term type word source start,end 0,8 payload
org.apache.solr.analysis.TrimFilterFactory {} term position 1
Have you tried using the Analysis page to see what tokens are generated
for the string "New York"? It could be one of the token filter is adding
the token 'new' for all strings that start with 'new'
On 10/06/2009 02:54 PM, Ravi Kiran wrote:
Hello All,
Iam getting some ghost face
Hello All,
Iam getting some ghost facets in solr 1.4. Can anybody kindly
help me understand why I get them and how to eliminate them. My schema.xml
snippet is given at the end. Iam indexing Named Entities extracted via
OpenNLP into solr. My understanding regarding KeywordTokenizerFact
12 matches
Mail list logo
