Re: Very bad performance

2008-12-01 Thread Cedric Houis
d that someone will work to improve faceted search. Could you >> tell >> me where I can tract those evolutions? > > Coming soon... see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-475 > > -Yonik > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Very-bad-performance-tp20366783p20768334.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-24 Thread Cedric Houis
tell >> me where I can tract those evolutions? > > Coming soon... see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-475 > > -Yonik > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Very-bad-performance-tp20366783p20666181.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-24 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Cedric Houis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've made the test with the latest nightly build of Solr. Performances are > similar. Yep, see http://www.nabble.com/NIO-not-working-yet-to20468152.html#a20468152 > You've said that someone will work to improve faceted sea

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-24 Thread Cedric Houis
it may improve some things slightly. > > -Yonik > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Very-bad-performance-tp20366783p20661305.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-07 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Cedric Houis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another remark, why do we have better performance when we use parallel > instances of SOLR that use the same index on the same machine? Internal locking. SOLR-465 was committed yesterday... it may improve some things slight

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-07 Thread Cedric Houis
:* >>nPersonNames >>nOrganizationNames >>nGeographicLocations >>nCategories >>searchable:true >> >>

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-07 Thread Cedric Houis
gt; run your query once and check the cache stats. > Then run the same query again... make sure the cache has not been > evicted. > > ryan > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Very-bad-performance-tp20366783p20383708.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-07 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
nOrganizationNames >>nGeographicLocations >>nCategories >>searchable:true >> >> >> >> >> Data : >> >> 367380 documents >

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-06 Thread Yonik Seeley
: 325142 distincts values > nOrganizationNames : 130681 distincts values > nCategories : 929 distincts values > nSimpleConcepts : 110198 distincts values > nComplexConcepts : 1508141 distincts values > Each of those fields has a maximum of 7 values per document. > > Query : &g

Re: Very bad performance

2008-11-06 Thread Ryan McKinley
Data : 367380 documents nGeographicLocations : 39298 distincts values nPersonNames : 325142 distincts values nOrganizationNames : 130681 distincts values nCategories : 929 distincts values nSimpleConcepts : 110198 distincts values nComplexConcepts : 1508141 distincts values Each of those fields

Very bad performance

2008-11-06 Thread Cedric Houis
ze the query time response…:-( Regards, Cédric Houis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Very-bad-performance-tp20366783p20366783.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.