e for this
> purpose?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> -
> Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-tmpfs-for-Solr-index-tp4181399.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
On 1/23/2015 2:40 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> If you have a single index on a box with enough memory to fully cache
> the index data, I would recommend just using MMapDirectory without
> involving tmpfs.
If it's Solr 4.x, I have pretty much the same advice, with one small
change. I would actually
On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 07:34 +0100, deniz wrote:
> Would it boost any performance in case the index has been switched from
> RAMDirectoryFactory to use tmpfs?
RAMDirectoryFactory does not perform well for non-small indexes, so ...
probable yes.
> Or it would simply do the same thing like MMap?
A
purpose?
Regards,
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-tmpfs-for-Solr-index-tp4181399.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.