Re: Using n-grams vs AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory for suggestions in solr

2016-07-04 Thread Alessandro Benedetti
Hi Harsha, my blog can help : http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/solr-you-complete-me.html Take a look to the related section. Cheers On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > 1> The difference is that the factory returns the original field > from a "sidecar" index. If

Re: Using n-grams vs AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory for suggestions in solr

2016-06-26 Thread Erick Erickson
1> The difference is that the factory returns the original field from a "sidecar" index. If you're content with just firing a standard query at your main index and returning the associated fields then you can do this from the main index. You won't be able to do the sophisticated stuff with weights

Using n-grams vs AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory for suggestions in solr

2016-06-24 Thread Harsha JSN
Hi, I have some doubts regarding usage of AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory as lookup implementation for suggestions. 1.) AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory constructs n-grams for the suggestion field while building suggestions index. If the main index which is used for search is already having n-grams for