e in solr.
> 3. The solr schema contains all fields, but in primitive form.
> I agree that managing the schema in two different places can be dangerous.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-ti
in solr.
> 3. The solr schema contains all fields, but in primitive form.
> I agree that managing the schema in two different places can be
> dangerous.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-time-tp4029953p4029960.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
dex itself will be in solr.
3. The solr schema contains all fields, but in primitive form.
I agree that managing the schema in two different places can be dangerous.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-time-tp4029953p4029960.html
On 1/1/2013 1:46 PM, dafna wrote:
thanks shawn for your answer.
I know that all of the analyzers, tokenizers, filters usally are on server
side.
That is exactly my question, if I will take them outside the engine, and do
it outside, is it still work the same ?
Solr can use a lucene index if th
.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-time-tp4029953p4029957.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 1/1/2013 1:03 PM, dafna wrote:
hi everyone,
I have a system written in .net that I'm using lucene .net.
I'm thinking of changing that system to be based on solr instead of lucene.
My situation is that I have a lot of code that was written in .net, that I
don't want to waste because moving to
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-lucene-net-Solr-at-the-same-time-tp4029953.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
