the fields is a
concern as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andy Crossen
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:05 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using hundreds of dynamic fields
Thanks, Jack and Jared, for your input on this. I'm looking into wheth
Thanks, Jack and Jared, for your input on this. I'm looking into whether
parent-child relationships via block or query time join will meet my
requirements.
Jack, I noticed in a bunch of other posts around the web that you've
suggested to use dynamic fields in moderation. Is this suggestion based
This is probably not the best answer, but my gut says that even if you
changed your document to a simple 2 fields and have one as your metric and
the other as a TrieDateField you would speed up and simplify your date
range queries.
--
Jared Whiklo
On 2014-06-27 10:10 AM, "Andy Crossen" wrote:
w metric
you have to read and rewrite all previous metrics for that document.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andy Crossen
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 11:10 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Using hundreds of dynamic fields
Hi folks,
My application requires tracking
Hi folks,
My application requires tracking a daily performance metric for all
documents. I start tracking for an 18 month window from the time a doc is
indexed, so each doc will have ~548 of these fields. I have in my schema a
dynamic field to capture this requirement:
Example:
metric_2014_06_
