s. I guess I'll do some bench
marks with these but if anyone has done similar and would like to share
results I'd appreciate it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-Hadoop-tp4034307p4035504.html
Sent from t
text:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-Hadoop-tp4034307p4035164.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
David,
I appreciate your time. I'm going to take a crack at the Lucene sharded
index approach and will let you know how I fare. Thanks again
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-Hadoop-tp4034307p4035211.html
What good is a key-value store in the context of oakstream's question?
~ David
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-H
-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-Hadoop-tp4034307p4034848.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e so fast over how things
worked before, it's for the same reason that Lucene 4 PrefixTree (a synonym
of Trie) based fields are fast. I don't think the underlying approach is
even possible in the big-table NoSQL based systems without some kind of
inverted index. If anyone knows otherwise
get.
Anyways, I've read some of your work in the past and appreciate your input.
I don't mind putting in some development work, just not sure the right
approach.
Thanks for your time. I appreciate it!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/U
need near real-time answers (within a
> couple seconds).
>
> If anyone has any thoughts on this I would greatly appreciate them.
>
> Thank you
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472
t;
> I'll be working with Terabytes of data
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-Hadoop-tp4034307p4034400.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
here lat/lon in (Polygon) AND COL3 = 'ABC'
Would this kind of setup make sense? Is there a better way?
I'll be working with Terabytes of data
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-Hadoop-tp4034307p4
4 and create spatial indexes on the hbase data that could be used
> to
> query this data?? I need near real-time answers (within a couple seconds).
>
> If anyone has any thoughts on this I would greatly appreciate them.
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in
eatly appreciate them.
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-Solr-Spatial-in-conjunction-with-HBASE-Hadoop-tp4034307.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
12 matches
Mail list logo