Thanks so much for all the answer, gonna test it out then..
Best Regards,
Felix Stanley
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:05 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using SOLR J 5.5.4 with SOLR 6.5
As I understand it, any node in the cluster will direct the document to the
leader for the appropriate shard.
Works for us.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:59 AM, David Hastings
> wrote:
>
> Thanks! Going to ha
Thanks! Going to have to throw up another solr 6.x instance for testing
again. Solr cloud will maintain index integrity across the nodes if
indexed to just one node correct?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> Yes, good old HTTP.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wu
Yes, good old HTTP.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:54 AM, David Hastings
> wrote:
>
> Do you use HttpSolrClient then?
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Walter Underwood
> wrote:
>
>> We run SolrJ 4.7.1 wi
Do you use HttpSolrClient then?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Walter Underwood
wrote:
> We run SolrJ 4.7.1 with Solr 6.5.1 (16 node cloud). No problems.
>
> We do not use the cloud-specific client and I’m pretty sure that we don’t
> use ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer. The latter is because it do
We run SolrJ 4.7.1 with Solr 6.5.1 (16 node cloud). No problems.
We do not use the cloud-specific client and I’m pretty sure that we don’t use
ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer. The latter is because it doesn’t report errors
properly.
We do our indexing through the load balancer and let the Solr Cloud
What about the ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer for solrj? That is what almost
all of my indexing code is using for solr 5.x, Its been a while since I
experimented with upgrading but i seem to remember having to go
to HttpSolrClient and couldnt get the code to compile, so i tabled the
experiment for a w
Felix:
There's no specific testing that I know of for this issue, it's "best
effort". Which means it _should_ work but I can't make promises.
Now that said, underlying it all is just HTTP requests going back and
forth so I know of no a-priori reasons it wouldn't be fine. It's just
"try it and see
On 9/18/2017 11:47 PM, Felix Stanley wrote:
> We are planning to use SOLR J 5.5.4 to query from SOLR 6.5.
>
> The reason was that we have to rely on JDK 1.7 at the client and as far as I
> know SOLR J 6.x.x only support JDK 1.8.
>
> I understood that SOLR J generally maintains backwards/forward com
Hi there,
We are planning to use SOLR J 5.5.4 to query from SOLR 6.5.
The reason was that we have to rely on JDK 1.7 at the client and as far as I
know SOLR J 6.x.x only support JDK 1.8.
I understood that SOLR J generally maintains backwards/forward compatibility
from this article:
https:
10 matches
Mail list logo