On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote:
> Thanks Robert,
>
> I'll use the workaround for now (using StandardTokenizerFactory and
> specifying version 3.1), but I suspect that I don't want the added URL/IP
> address recognition due to my use case. I've also talked to a couple peo
es. (Unless someone beats
me to it :)
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnalyzer with UAX#29 support
from Solr
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote:
> We are trying to solve some multilingual issues with our Solr analysis filter
> chain and would like to use the new Lucene 3.x filters that are Unicode
> compliant.
>
> Is it possible to use the Lucene ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnaly
We are trying to solve some multilingual issues with our Solr analysis filter
chain and would like to use the new Lucene 3.x filters that are Unicode
compliant.
Is it possible to use the Lucene ICUTokenizerFilter or StandardAnalyzer with
UAX#29 support from Solr?
Is it just a matter of writing
