On 3/22/2019 2:02 AM, Hubert-Price, Neil wrote:
One other question
Is there a system level configuration that can change the default for the sow=
parameter? Can it be flipped to have the default set to true?
Any parameter can be put into the query handler definition. In
defaults, inva
One other question
Is there a system level configuration that can change the default for the sow=
parameter? Can it be flipped to have the default set to true?
Many Thanks,
Neil
On 22/03/2019, 08:36, "Hubert-Price, Neil" wrote:
Thanks Erick, that makes sense.
However it do
Thanks Erick, that makes sense.
However it does lead me to another conclusion: in Solr prior to 6.0, or with
sow=true on Solr 6.0+ that would mean that the ShingleFilter is totally
ineffective within query analysers. It would be logically equivalent to not
having the ShingleFilter configur
sow was introduced in Solr 6, so it’s just ignored in 4x.
bq. Surely the tokenizer splits on white space anyway, or it wouldn't work?
I didn’t work on that code, so I don’t have the details off the top of my head,
but I’ll take a stab at it as far as my understanding goes. The result is in
your
Hi Erick,
I've run a series of tests using debug=true, the same original query, and
variations around sow=true/sow=false/not set. See links below for .txt files
containing the output. I have removed any genuine document content and
replaced it with .. because I don't have the customer's p
Neil:
Yeah, the attachment-stripping is catches everyone first time, we’re so used to
just adding anything we want to an e-mail…
I don’t know enough about the query parsing to answer off the top of my head. I
do know one thing that’s changed is “Split on Whitespace” has changed from true
to fa
Hello Erick,
This is the first time I've had reason to use the mailing list, so I wasn't
aware of the behaviour around attachments. See below, links to the images that
I originally sent as attachments, both are screenshots from within Eclipse MAT
looking at a SOLR heap dump.
LargeQueryStructu
The Apache mail server aggressively strips attachments, so yours didn’t come
through. People often provide links to images stored somewhere else
As to why this is behaving this way, I’m pretty clueless. A _complete_ shot in
the dark is the query parsing changed its default for split on white
Hello All,
We have a recently upgraded system that went from Solr 4.6 to Solr 7.1 (used as
part of an ecommerce application). In the upgraded version we are seeing
frequent issues with very high Solr memory usage for certain types of query,
but the older 4.6 version does not produce the same r
