There has been modification in field types. I would suggest you need to
compare two schema and then may be you have to reindex it. Other than that
latest version has light footprint so it should be the case.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:05 PM kshitij tyagi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any suggestions from anyo
Hi,
Any suggestions from anyone?
Regards,
kshitij
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:11 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Please don’t cross-post, this discussion belongs in solr-user only.
>
> Jan
>
> > 14. jan. 2020 kl. 22:22 skrev kshitij tyagi >:
> >
> > Also trie fileds have been updated to point fields, w
Please don’t cross-post, this discussion belongs in solr-user only.
Jan
> 14. jan. 2020 kl. 22:22 skrev kshitij tyagi :
>
> Also trie fileds have been updated to point fields, will that by any chance
> degrade my response time by 50 percent?
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM kshitij tyagi
>
Also trie fileds have been updated to point fields, will that by any chance
degrade my response time by 50 percent?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:37 PM kshitij tyagi
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am currently upgrading my system from solr 6.6 to solr 8.2 :
>
> 1. I am observing increased search time in m
Hi Team,
I am currently upgrading my system from solr 6.6 to solr 8.2 :
1. I am observing increased search time in my queries i.e. search response
time is increasing along with cpu utilisation, although memory looks fine,
on analysing heap dumps I figured out that queries are taking most of the
