: As in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages?
Exactly ... the title is "XML Messages for Updating a Solr Index"
But i do see some confusing usages of "add/update" in the context of
documents that definitely don't belong there -- so i've changed them to
"add/replace".
Thanks for bring
> From: Benson Margulies [bimargul...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:05 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Updating fields in an existing document
>
> We find ourselves in the following quandry:
>
> At initial index time, we st
As in http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages?
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> : A followup. The wiki has a whole discussion of the 'update' XML
> : message. But solrj has nothing like it. Does that really exist? Is
> : there a reason to use it? If I just 'add' the
: A followup. The wiki has a whole discussion of the 'update' XML
: message. But solrj has nothing like it. Does that really exist? Is
: there a reason to use it? If I just 'add' the document a second time,
: it will replace?
You should only see "update" in Solr docs used in the context of
"updat
have
> many of them at once it could be, or if you end up needing to very
> frequently commit to an index it can indeed cause problems.
> >
> > From: Benson Margulies [bimargul...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:05
m: Benson Margulies [bimargul...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:05 PM
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Updating fields in an existing document
>
> We find ourselves in the following quandry:
>
> At initial index time, we store a value in a field, and we use it for
> face
: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 6:05 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: Updating fields in an existing document
We find ourselves in the following quandry:
At initial index time, we store a value in a field, and we use it for
facetting. So it, seemingly, has to be there as a field.
However, from time to time, so
We find ourselves in the following quandry:
At initial index time, we store a value in a field, and we use it for
facetting. So it, seemingly, has to be there as a field.
However, from time to time, something happens that causes us to want
to change this value. As far as we know, this requires us
