On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/20/2011 8:08 PM, entdeveloper wrote:
>>
>> Technically, yes, it's valid json, but most libraries treat the json
>> objects
>> as maps, and with multiple "add" elements as the keys, you cannot properly
>> deserialize.
>>
>> As an example,
On 6/20/2011 8:08 PM, entdeveloper wrote:
Technically, yes, it's valid json, but most libraries treat the json objects
as maps, and with multiple "add" elements as the keys, you cannot properly
deserialize.
As an example, try putting this into jsonlint.com, and notice it trims off
one of the doc
ot;id" : "TestDoc2", "title" : "another test"} }
}
Is there something I'm just not seeing? Should we consider cleaning up this
format, possibly using some json arrays so that it makes more sense from a
json perspective?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Update-JSON-Invalid-tp3088963p3088963.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
