http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/link?url=http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> Yes, the SignatureUpdateProcessor is what you want. The 128-bit hash is
> exactly what you want to use in this situation. You will never get the
> same ID
Yes, the SignatureUpdateProcessor is what you want. The 128-bit hash is
exactly what you want to use in this situation. You will never get the
same ID for two urls- collisions have never been observed "in the wild" for
this hash algorithm.
Another cool thing about using hash-codes as fields is th
Hi Hoss,
Thanks for getting back to me on this.
: I've been trying to use the UUIDField in solr to maintain ids of the
>: pages I've crawled with nutch (as per
>: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey). The use case is that I want to
>: have the server able to use these ids in another database
: I've been trying to use the UUIDField in solr to maintain ids of the
: pages I've crawled with nutch (as per
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey). The use case is that I want to
: have the server able to use these ids in another database for various
: statistics gathering. So I want the l
Hi,
I've been trying to use the UUIDField in solr to maintain ids of the pages I've
crawled with nutch (as per http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey). The use case
is that I want to have the server able to use these ids in another database for
various statistics gathering. So I want the link u
