On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:31 PM, mechravi25 wrote:
> Can you please suggest the definition of the terms component for the
> underlying shard cores.
If you look at my earlier email, you will see the limit is set in "invariants"
rather than defaults. This makes it so the param cannot be dynamically
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your suggestion.
My Exact scenario is that, I have one master core which has many underlying
shards core(Disturbed architecture). I want the terms.limit should be
defaulted to 10 in the underlying shards cores. When i hit the master core,
it will in-turn hit the underlying s
On Nov 19, 2011, at 4:19 AM, mechravi25 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we pass the terms.limit parameter to the master (which has many shard
> cores), it's not getting pushed down to the individual cores. Instead the
> default value of -1 is assigned to Terms.limit parameter is assigned in the
> underlyi
Hi,
When we pass the terms.limit parameter to the master (which has many shard
cores), it's not getting pushed down to the individual cores. Instead the
default value of -1 is assigned to Terms.limit parameter is assigned in the
underlying shard cores. The issue being the time taken by the Master
