because you didn't want to change that variable just now?
>>
>> -Yonik
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840668.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
t;
> new faceting stuff off because it didn't improve things in your case,
> or because you didn't want to change that variable just now?
>
> -Yonik
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840668.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
know if it improves your
>> scenario.
>>
>> -Yonik
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840017.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Let us know if it improves your
> scenario.
>
> -Yonik
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20840017.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
FYI, SOLR-465 has been committed. Let us know if it improves your scenario.
-Yonik
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:18 PM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to integrate this improvement into my deployment. Is it ju
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:18 PM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to integrate this improvement into my deployment. Is it just a
> matter of getting the latest Lucene jars (Lucene nightly build)?
You need to apply this source code patch to Solr:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
ecently improved in Lucene
> for non-Windows boxes, and we're integrating that into Solr (should
> def be in the next release).
>
> -Yonik
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20349247.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:44 PM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try changing my other caches to LRUCache and observe performance.
> Interestingly, the FastLRUCache has given me a ~10% increase in performance,
> much lower than I've read on the SOLR-667 thread.
That's better than I woul
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Feak, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yonik said something about the FastLRUCache giving the most gain for
> high hit-rates and the LRUCache being faster for low hit-rates.
Right, for single-threaded requests. FastLRUCache has faster gets and
slower puts (on aver
your user base? I realize this probably
> isn't part of your bottleneck, just curious.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20348749.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
curious.
-Todd Feak
-Original Message-
From: wojtekpia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 11:08 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Throughput Optimization
My documentCache hit rate is ~.7, and my queryCache is ~.03. I'm using
FastLRUCache on al
iginal Message-
> From: wojtekpia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:15 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Throughput Optimization
>
>
> Yes, I am seeing evictions. I've tried setting my filterCache higher,
> but
> then I
ctory patch uses It.
>
> - Mark
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20345965.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
What are your other cache hit rates looking like?
Which caches are you using the FastLRUCache on?
-Todd Feak
-Original Message-
From: wojtekpia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:15 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Throughput Optimization
Yes
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:14 AM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I am seeing evictions. I've tried setting my filterCache higher, but
> then I start getting Out Of Memory exceptions. My filterCache hit ratio is >
> .99. It looks like I've hit a RAM bound here.
Evictions on the filterCa
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:15 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Throughput Optimization
Yes, I am seeing evictions. I've tried setting my filterCache higher,
but
then I start getting Out Of Memory exceptions. My filterCache hit ratio
is >
.99. It
?
2. Why does CPU utilization fall when I make more than 8 concurrent
requests?
3. Is there an obvious bottleneck that I'm missing?
4. Does Tomcat have any settings that affect Solr performance?
Any input is greatly appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Th
f requests I could make per
>> second
>> didn't increase). This makes no sense to me, unless there is another
>> bottle
>> neck somewhere.
>> 3. Reduced the number of records in my index. The throughput
>> increased, but
>> the shape of all my graphs
The latest alt directory patch uses It.
- Mark
On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:25 AM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're probably hitting some contention with the locking around the
reading of index files... this has been recently improved in Lucene
for non-Windows boxes, and we're integra
You're probably hitting some contention with the locking around the
reading of index files... this has been recently improved in Lucene
for non-Windows boxes, and we're integrating that into Solr (should
def be in the next release).
-Yonik
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:01 PM, wojtekpia <[EMAIL PROTECT
e an obvious bottleneck that I'm missing?
4. Does Tomcat have any settings that affect Solr performance?
Any input is greatly appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20335132.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
?
3. Is there an obvious bottleneck that I'm missing?
4. Does Tomcat have any settings that affect Solr performance?
Any input is greatly appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-Optimization-tp20335132p20335132.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
22 matches
Mail list logo
