/about/jobs.html?mls
> Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Jérôme Etévé
>> To: Otis Gospodnetic
>> Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:39:33 PM
>> Sub
ent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:39:33 PM
> Subject: Re: Synonym aware string field typ
>
> Hi Otis,
>
> Thanks. Yep, this synonym behaviour is the one I want.
>
> So if I don't want the synonyms to be applied at index time, I need
> to specify an index time analyzer r
essage
>> From: Jérôme Etévé
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 7:33:28 AM
>> Subject: Synonym aware string field typ
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to have a string type which is synonym aware at query ti
Etévé
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 7:33:28 AM
> Subject: Synonym aware string field typ
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to have a string type which is synonym aware at query time.
> Is it ok to have something like that:
>
&g
Hi all,
I'd like to have a string type which is synonym aware at query time.
Is it ok to have something like that:
My questions are:
- Will the index time analyzer stay the default for the type solr.StrField .
- Is the KeywordTokenizerFactory the right one to
