.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:51:57 PM
Subject: Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Otis,
Thanks for the information. It looks like the field collapsing is
similar to
what I am looking. But is that in the current release? Is it
stable?
Is there anyway to do it in Solr
is a good one.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: John Martyniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:51:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
he.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:16:21 PM
Subject: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Hi,
I am a new solr user.
I have an application that I would like to show the results but one
result may
be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1
might also have
10 other result
TECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:16:21 PM
> Subject: Sum of Fields and Record Count
>
> Hi,
>
> I am a new solr user.
>
> I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result
> may
> be
Grant,
For the more like this that would show the "grouped" results, once you
have clicked on the item, so basically making another query, would it
show a "count" of the more like this results?
Something like "cxxc and a collection 10 other items".
-John
On Dec 10, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Gran
Grant,
Basically I have created a text field that has the grouping value.
All of the records would have the same value in this text field. This
is accomplished with some pre-processing. When I capture the data, but
before it is submitted into the index.
-John
On Dec 10, 2008, at 8:46
Hi John,
What is your process for determining that #1 is part of the other
result set? My gut says this is a faceting problem, i.e. #1 has a
field contain its "category" that is also shared by the 10 other
results, and that all you need to do is facet on the "category" field.
The other t
Hi,
I am a new solr user.
I have an application that I would like to show the results but one
result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example
result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same
data set.
Hopefully this makes sense.
What I would like to
