by reduction as well as
> stemming by
> > expansion
> > > to cover grammatical variations on a word*. A use case will
> make it
> > more
> > > clear:
> > >
> > > - a search for fish would also find fishing
> > > -
t or burns/*
> >
> > Since all stemmers supported Lucene/Solr all use stemming by
> reduction, we
> > are not sure on how to go about this. As per the Solr Wiki:
> >
> > > A related technology to stemming is lemmatization, which
allo
hen /searching
for
> burn
> > the
> > results are not returning for burning or burnt or burns/*
> >
> > Since all stemmers supported Lucene/Solr all use stemming by
> reduction, we
> > are not sure on how to go about this. As per the Solr
rning and burn/ but when /searching for
> burn
> > the
> > results are not returning for burning or burnt or burns/*
> >
> > Since all stemmers supported Lucene/Solr all use stemming by
> reduction, we
> > are not sure on how to go about this. As per the Solr Wiki
ing a root word and 'expanding' it to all
of
> > its various forms. Lemmatization can be used either at insertion time
or
> > at query time. Lucene/Solr does not have built-in support for
> > lemmatization but it can be simulated by using your own dictionaries
and
>
and using some public database like
> WordNet to extract the different grammatical variations of the stem and
> then
> send across all these terms for querying in Solr. We have not yet done a
> lot
> of research to figure out a stable C# stemmer/lemmatizer and a WordNet C#
> API, b
oo convoluted and it should have a way to
be executed from within Solr.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Stemming-query-in-Solr-tp4073862.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
