jhonny.lo...@prodigious.com
www.prodigious.com
-Mensaje original-
De: Walter Underwood
Enviado el: viernes, 1 de mayo de 2020 11:24 a.m.
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Possible issue with Stemming and nouns ended with suffix 'ion'
This email has been sent fro
...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On May 1, 2020, at 8:45 AM, Mike Drob wrote:
>
> This is how things get stemmed *now*, but I believe there is an open
> question as to whether that is how they *should* be stemmed. Specifically,
> the case appears to be -ify words
This is how things get stemmed *now*, but I believe there is an open
question as to whether that is how they *should* be stemmed. Specifically,
the case appears to be -ify words not stemming to the same as -ification -
this applies to much more than identify/identification. Also, justify,
fortify
From: Mike Drob
Sent: jueves, 30 de abril de 2020 5:30 p. m.
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible issue with Stemming and nouns ended with suffix 'ion'
This email has been sent from a source external to Publicis Groupe. Please
use caution when
5:37 PM Jhonny Lopez
wrote:
> Yes, sounds like worth it.
>
> Thanks guys!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Drob
> Sent: jueves, 30 de abril de 2020 5:30 p. m.
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Possible issue with Stemming and nouns ended with
Yes, sounds like worth it.
Thanks guys!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Drob
Sent: jueves, 30 de abril de 2020 5:30 p. m.
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Possible issue with Stemming and nouns ended with suffix 'ion'
This email has been sent from a source e
Is this worth filing a bug/suggestion to the folks over at snowballstem.org?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:08 PM Audrey Lorberfeld -
audrey.lorberf...@ibm.com wrote:
> I agree with Erick. I think that's just how the cookie crumbles when
> stemming. If you have some time on your han
I agree with Erick. I think that's just how the cookie crumbles when stemming.
If you have some time on your hands, you can integrate OpenNLP with your Solr
instance and start using the lemmas of tokens instead of the stems. In this
case, I believe if you were to lemmatize both "ide
If you use the stemmer in your query analysis it should act the same, right?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:54 PM Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> They are being stemmed to two different tokens, “identif” and “identifi”.
> Stemming is algorithmic and imperfect and in this case you’re getting bit
They are being stemmed to two different tokens, “identif” and “identifi”.
Stemming is algorithmic and imperfect and in this case you’re getting bitten by
that algorithm. It looks like you’re using PorterStemFilter, if you want you
can look up the exact algorithm, but I don’t think it’s a bug
Sure, rewriting the message with links for images:
We’re facing an issue with stemming in solr. Most of the cases are working
correctly, for example, if we search for bidding, solr brings results for
bidding, bid, bids, etc. However, with nouns ended with ‘ion’ suffix, stemming
is not working
The mail server is pretty aggressive about stripping links, so we can’t see the
images.
Could you put them somewhere and paste a link?
Best,
Erick
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 2:40 PM, Jhonny Lopez
> wrote:
>
> We’re facing an issue with stemming in solr. Most of the cases are working
We're facing an issue with stemming in solr. Most of the cases are working
correctly, for example, if we search for bidding, solr brings results for
bidding, bid, bids, etc. However, with nouns ended with 'ion' suffix, stemming
is not working. Even when analyzers seems to have c
Hi Dhanesh,
Use KeywordRepeatFilterFactory
<https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/language-analysis.html#keywordrepeatfilterfactory>.
It will emit each token twice and marking one of them as KEYWORD so
stemming won't work on that token. Use RemoveDuplicates to remove the
duplicates
_exact to text_general. Then, you can use edismax parser to search
> both
> > fields, but giving text_exact a higher boost (qf=text_exact^5
> > text_general). In this case, both fields should be indexed, but only one
> > needs to be stored.
> >
> > Edward
> >
t;
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:34 AM Dhanesh Radhakrishnan >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm facing an issue with stemming.
> > My search query is "restaurant dubai" and returns results.
> > If I search "restaurants dubai" it returns no data.
>
giving text_exact a higher boost (qf=text_exact^5
text_general). In this case, both fields should be indexed, but only one
needs to be stored.
Edward
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:34 AM Dhanesh Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm facing an issue with stemming.
> My search query is &qu
Hello,
I'm facing an issue with stemming.
My search query is "restaurant dubai" and returns results.
If I search "restaurants dubai" it returns no data.
How to stem this keyword "restaurant dubai" with "restaurants dubai" ?
I'm using a
being not available. Please confirm
>if it's available in analysis directory.
>- Also, what Solr version are you using? *EnglishPorterFilterFactory* is
>already *deprecated* and I suggest you to use
>*SnowballPorterFilterFactory* with *language="English" *in
ish" *instead. You
need to add the stemming in query time analysis chain too, otherwise, query
as "bags" will not match with "bag" (indexed).
Hope this helps.
On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 at 15:42, Shubham Goswami
wrote:
> Hi Jorn
>
> Thanks for your response.
&
uot;synonyms.txt"/>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 2:10 PM Jörn Franke
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> How did you define the field type? Probably you have synt
gt;>> I recommend to use the schema rest api instead of schema xml as it will
>>>> give you better feedback on what is wrong and it allows you also better
>>>> versioning of the schema in a source code repository.
>>>>
>>>> htt
ad of schema xml as it will
> >> give you better feedback on what is wrong and it allows you also better
> >> versioning of the schema in a source code repository.
> >>
> >> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/schema-api.html
> >>
> >>
>
nd to use the schema rest api instead of schema xml as it will
>> give you better feedback on what is wrong and it allows you also better
>> versioning of the schema in a source code repository.
>>
>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/schema-api.html
>>
y.
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/schema-api.html
>
>
> > Am 01.11.2019 um 06:41 schrieb Shubham Goswami <
> shubham.gosw...@hotwax.co>:
> >
> > Hello Community
> >
> > I am using a filter class EnglishPorterFilterFactory for stemming filter
>
://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_2/schema-api.html
> Am 01.11.2019 um 06:41 schrieb Shubham Goswami :
>
> Hello Community
>
> I am using a filter class EnglishPorterFilterFactory for stemming filter
> but because of usage of this class, my solr is not able reload the schema.
>
> Ca
Hello Community
I am using a filter class EnglishPorterFilterFactory for stemming filter
but because of usage of this class, my solr is not able reload the schema.
Can somebody please let me know what exactly this class does and how can i
implement stemming ?
Any help will be appreciated. Thanks
Hi,
we are using the SnowballPorterFilter to stem our tokens for serveral
languages.
Now we want to update the list of protected words over the Solr-API.
As I can see, there are only solutions for SynonymFilter and the
StopwordFilter with ManagedSynonymFilter and ManagedStopFilter.
Do you know
used, and then get replaced
by Solr code.
Many thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Thursday 22nd November 2018 15:39
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; solr-user
> Subject: RE: KeywordRepeat, stemming, (single term) synonyms and minimum
&g
kus Jelsma
> Sent: Sunday 18th November 2018 23:21
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; solr-user
> Subject: RE: KeywordRepeat, stemming, (single term) synonyms and minimum
> should match (edismax)
>
> Hello,
>
> Apologies for bothering you all again, but i really need
arkus
-Original message-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Tuesday 13th November 2018 9:52
> To: solr-user
> Subject: KeywordRepeat, stemming, (single term) synonyms and minimum should
> match (edismax)
>
> Hello, apologies for this long winded e-mail.
>
> O
m? How can i get the same stable results for both queries?
Does the odd positon increment have anything to do with it (it seems Lucene's
QueryBuilder does something with it). What do i need to do?
Many thanks,
Markus
ps. this is on Solr 7.2.1 and 7.5.0.
[1]
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.
to be hard-coded either within the algorithm, which it is not, or
outside by for example a StemmerOverrideFilter.
Regards,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:aishwarya
> Sent: Friday 21st September 2018 10:38
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Grammatical tenses Stem
1
down vote
favorite
i want to know which stemming filter factory can be used to fetch all the
possible tenses of a stem word.
example : if "run" is the search word -> it has to fetch results for all
files involving run , running , runs , ran.
also the vice-versa --> whichever
part again, i clearly missed it the last
time.
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Alessandro Benedetti
> Sent: Friday 18th May 2018 12:54
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Multiple languages, boosting and, stemming and KeywordRepeat
>
> Hi Mark
t find
> anything in the Lucene or Solr Javadocs, or the reference manual.
>
> Many thanks, again,
> Markus
>
>
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Markus Jelsma
> > Sent: Wednesday 9th May 2018 17:39
> > To: solr-user
> > Subject: Multipl
-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Wednesday 9th May 2018 17:39
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Multiple languages, boosting and, stemming and KeywordRepeat
>
> Hello,
>
> First, apologies for the weird subject line.
>
> We index many languages and search over al
Hello,
First, apologies for the weird subject line.
We index many languages and search over all those languages at once, but boost
the language of the user's preference. To differentiate between stemmed tokens
and unstemmed tokens we use KeywordRepeat and RemoveDuplicates, this works very
well
s how these flags will control spell checking.
> > Probably we can control it from those files in HunspellStemFilterFactory?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Edwin
> >
> >
> > On 2 November 2017 at 17:46, Emir Arnautović <
> emir.arnauto...@sematext.com>
>
d an affix file
> that specifies how these flags will control spell checking.
> Probably we can control it from those files in HunspellStemFilterFactory?
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>
> On 2 November 2017 at 17:46, Emir Arnautović
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Edwin,
>>
On 2 November 2017 at 17:46, Emir Arnautović
wrote:
> Hi Edwin,
> It seems that it would be best if you do not apply *ing stemming rule at
> all. The first idea is to trick stemmer and replace any word that ends with
> ing to some nonexisting char combination e.g. ‘wqx’.
Hi Edwin,
It seems that it would be best if you do not apply *ing stemming rule at all.
The first idea is to trick stemmer and replace any word that ends with ing to
some nonexisting char combination e.g. ‘wqx’. You can use
solr.PatternReplaceFilterFactory to do that. You can switch it back
Hi Emir,
We do have quite alot of words that should not be stemmed. Currently, the
KStemFilterFactory are stemming all the non-English words that end with
"ing" as well. There are quite alot of places and names which ends in
"ing", and all these are being stemmed as wel
. If you want to find documents that contain only
“walking” with search term “walk”, then you have to stem at index time. Cases
when you use stemming on query time only are rare and specific.
If you want to prefer exact matches over stemmed matches, you have to index
same content with and without
Hi,
We are currently using KStemFilterFactory in Solr, but we found that it is
actually doing stemming on non-English words like "ximenting", which it
stem to "ximent". This is not what we wanted.
Another option is to use the HunspellStemFilterFactory, but there are som
k" but don't show result for those document which have word "saks". I
assume that this sak is not actually singular word for saks and saks is
also not plural for sak, this is only one sentence like "saks fifth avenue"
like this in document. So I get this issue due to stemmi
"sak" but don't show result for those document which have word "saks". I
assume that this sak is not actually singular word for saks and saks is
also not plural for sak, this is only one sentence like "saks fifth avenue"
like this in document. So I get this issu
Thank you both for your answers.
I tried to find some French homophone words (tache / tâche, bouche /
bouché, ...) with different stems (with snowball, minimal and light
stemmers), but without success. So put the ASCIIFolding filter before the
stemmer is not a big issue (in French) for precision.
Hi,
I have experimented before, and found that Snowball is sensitive to
accents/diacritics.
Please see for more details:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457315001053
Ahmet
On Friday, February 10, 2017 11:27 AM, Dominique Bejean
wrote:
Hi,
Is the SnowballPorterFilter
The easiest way to answer that is to define two different fieldTypes,
one with Snowball first and one with ASCIIFolding first, fire up the
admin/analysis page and give it some input. That'll show you _exactly_
what transformations take place at each step.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:26
Hi,
Is the SnowballPorterFilter sensitive to the accents for French for
instance ?
If I use both SnowballPorterFilter and ASCIIFoldingFilter, do I have to
configure ASCIIFoldingFilter after SnowballPorterFilter ?
Regards.
Dominique
--
Dominique Béjean
06 08 46 12 43
Thank you all for the replies. I am considering the suggestions
On 17 Dec 2016 01:50, "Susheel Kumar" wrote:
> To handle irregular nouns (
> http://www.ef.com/english-resources/english-grammar/
> singular-and-plural-nouns/),
> the simplest way is handle them using StemOverriderFactory. The lis
To handle irregular nouns (
http://www.ef.com/english-resources/english-grammar/singular-and-plural-nouns/),
the simplest way is handle them using StemOverriderFactory. The list is
not so long. Or otherwise go for commercial solutions like basistech etc.
as Alex suggested oR you can customize Hun
If you need the full fidelity solution taking care of multiple
edge-cases, it could be worth looking at commercial solutions.
http://www.basistech.com/ has one, including a free-level SAAS plan.
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
O
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies,
@eric, ahmet : since those stemmers are logical stemmers it won't work on
words such as caught, ran and so on. So in our case it won't work
@susheel : Yes I thought about it but problems we have is, the documents we
index are some what large text, so copy fielding
We did extensive comparison in the past for Snowball, KStem and Hunspell
and there are cases where one of them works better but not other or
vice-versa. You may utilise all three of them by having 3 different fields
(fieldTypes) and during query, search in all of them.
For some of the cases where
Hi,
KStemFilter returns legitimate English words, please use it.
Ahmet
On Thursday, December 15, 2016 6:17 PM, Lasitha Wattaladeniya
wrote:
Hello devs,
I'm trying to develop this indexing and querying flow where it converts the
words to its original form (lemmatization). I was doing bit of
What about things like PorterStemFilterFactory,
EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory and the like?
Best,
Erick
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Lasitha Wattaladeniya
wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> I'm trying to develop this indexing and querying flow where it converts the
> words to its original form (lemm
Hello devs,
I'm trying to develop this indexing and querying flow where it converts the
words to its original form (lemmatization). I was doing bit of research
lately but the information on the internet is very limited. I tried using
hunspellfactory but it doesn't convert the word to it's original
Thanks again so much =)
Sas
-Original Message-
From: Aurélien MAZOYER [mailto:aurelien.mazo...@francelabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 4:36 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [E] Re: Stemming
Hi,
I was just wondering if you are sure that you query only that field (or
[mailto:aurelien.mazo...@francelabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 4:36 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [E] Re: Stemming
Hi,
I was just wondering if you are sure that you query only that field (or fields
that use your text_stem analyzer) and not other fields (in your qf for
Sas
-Original Message-
From: Aurélien MAZOYER [mailto:aurelien.mazo...@francelabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 4:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [E] Re: Stemming
Hi,
Yes you should have the same resultset.
Are you sure that you reindex all the data after changing your schema
ginal Message-
From: Aurélien MAZOYER [mailto:aurelien.mazo...@francelabs.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 4:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [E] Re: Stemming
Hi,
Yes you should have the same resultset.
Are you sure that you reindex all the data after changing your schema?
Ar
:
Hi Guys,
I have enabled stemming:
In the Admin Analysis, I type in running or runs and they both break down to
run.
However when I search for run, runs, or running with an actual query -
It brings back three different
They both produced three different sets of results
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:37 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [E] Re: Stemming
Hi Jamal,
Snowball
ve enabled stemming:
In the Admin Analysis, I type in running or runs and they both break down to
run.
However when I search for run, runs, or running with an actual query -
It brings back three different sets of results.
Is that correct?
I would imagine that
Hi Guys,
I have enabled stemming:
In the Admin Analysis, I type in running or runs and they both break down to
run.
However when I search for run, runs, or running with an actual query -
It brings back three different
; >
> > I am following this tutorial:
> >
> >
> http://thinknook.com/keyword-stemming-and-lemmatisation-with-apache-solr-2013-08-02/
> >
> > My (Managed) Schema file looks like this: (in the appropr
am
Fr., 3. Juni 2016 um 20:12 Uhr:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am following this tutorial:
>
> http://thinknook.com/keyword-stemming-and-lemmatisation-with-apache-solr-2013-08-02/
>
> My (Managed) Schema file looks like this: (in the appropriate places)
&
Oops, ignore. Shawn answered that with a link earlier. I was reading
this on the phone
Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 5 June 2016 at 14:32, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Isn't just reloading the core via Admin interface suff
Isn't just reloading the core via Admin interface sufficient?
I though that all Solr driven changes are written out to managed-schema at
once, so as long as core is reloaded right after manual changes, it should
be OK.
Regards,
Alex
On 4 Jun 2016 10:12 am, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
> Actually
Actually, I prefer to do it the other way:
1> shut down Solr
2> edit managed_schema
3> start Solr.
that eliminates any possibility of inadvertently overwriting your
changes by issuing a managed schema call.
that's a nit though, either will work.
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Sh
Hi Guys,
I am following this tutorial:
http://thinknook.com/keyword-stemming-and-lemmatisation-with-apache-solr-2013-08-02/
My (Managed) Schema file looks like this: (in the appropriate places)
-
-
-
-
I have re-indexed everything -
It is
On 6/3/2016 9:22 AM, Jamal, Sarfaraz wrote:
> I would edit the managed-schema, make my changes, shutdown solr? And
> start it back up and verify it is still there?
That's the sledgehammer approach. Simple and effective, but Solr does
go offline for a short time.
> Or is there another way to rel
...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 11:17 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [E] Re: Stemming and Managed Schema
On 6/3/2016 9:07 AM, Jamal, Sarfaraz wrote:
> I found the following article:
> http://thinknook.com/keyword-stemming-and-lemmatisation-with-apache-so
> lr-2
On 6/3/2016 9:07 AM, Jamal, Sarfaraz wrote:
> I found the following article:
> http://thinknook.com/keyword-stemming-and-lemmatisation-with-apache-solr-2013-08-02/
>
> And I want to do stemming on one of our fields.
>
> However, I am using a Managed Schema and I am unsure ho
Sure, this is the API reference [1] where you can see, you can add types
and fields
Andrea
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schema+API
On 03/06/16 17:07, Jamal, Sarfaraz wrote:
Hi Guys,
I found the following article:
http://thinknook.com/keyword-stemming-and
Hi Guys,
I found the following article:
http://thinknook.com/keyword-stemming-and-lemmatisation-with-apache-solr-2013-08-02/
And I want to do stemming on one of our fields.
However, I am using a Managed Schema and I am unsure how to add these two
blocks to it -
I know there is an API for
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Mark Vega
>> Sent: Thursday 19th May 2016 19:55
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Stemming nouns ending in 'y'
>>
>> I am using Apache Nutch v1.10 and SOLR v.5.2.1 to index and search a medical
>&g
Hello - try the KStem filter. It is better suited for english and doesn't show
this behaviour.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Mark Vega
> Sent: Thursday 19th May 2016 19:55
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Stemming nouns ending in 'y'
>
&
I am using Apache Nutch v1.10 and SOLR v.5.2.1 to index and search a medical
website and am trying to find out why every stemmer I've tried on certain nouns
in medical terminology ending in 'y' merely replaces the ending 'y' with an
'I'. As example, the term 'osteopathy' stemmed with the Porter
wrote:
> I wanna to write my own text tokenizer.
> And my question is about what solr treat with stemming or lemmatizing?
> Solr store both lemmatizerd token and orginal token together?
> I mean if in index time solr lemmatize creation to create.
> And in query time.user want to searc
I wanna to write my own text tokenizer.
And my question is about what solr treat with stemming or lemmatizing?
Solr store both lemmatizerd token and orginal token together?
I mean if in index time solr lemmatize creation to create.
And in query time.user want to search about exactly creation not
String objF = jsonarray.getString(i);
> > stemmedWords.add(objF);
> > }
> >
> > String lastStemmedGroup = stemmedWords.get(stemmedWords.size() -
> > 1).toString();
> >
> > JSONArray finalStemmer = new JSONArray(lastStemmedGroup);
> >
> >
ct(i);
> String stemmedWord = jsonobject.getString("text");
> System.out.println(stemmedWord);
> }
>
> }
>
> }
>
>
> Here, args[0] is core.
> args[1] is the word i'll be sending for stemming.
> args[2] is the Ana
temmer.length(); i++) {
JSONObject jsonobject = finalStemmer.getJSONObject(i);
String stemmedWord = jsonobject.getString("text");
System.out.println(stemmedWord);
}
}
}
Here, args[0] is core.
args[1] is the word i'll be sending for stemming.
args[
; > >
> > > >
> > > > > > > href="#/">Dashboard
> > > >
> > > > > > > href="#/~logging">Logging
> > > >
> > > >
d
> > >
> > > href="#/~cloud?view=tree">Tree
> > > Graph
> > > Graph
> > > (Radial)
> > > Dump
> > >
> > >
;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
> ">Documentation
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR";>Is
> Dump
> >
> >
> >
> > Core
> > Admin
> >
> > > href="#/~java-properties">Java Properties
> >
> > Thread
> > Dump
> >
>
0' };
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Ritesh Sinha wrote:
> > I am learning solr and want to use solr for stemming words.I'll be
> > passing
> > the word to the solr and it should send the stemmed
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Ritesh Sinha wrote:
> I am learning solr and want to use solr for stemming words.I'll be
> passing
> the word to the solr and it should send the stemmed word back.I know how
> to
> configure solr core for different stemming patterns and also
I am learning solr and want to use solr for stemming words.I'll be passing
the word to the solr and it should send the stemmed word back.I know how to
configure solr core for different stemming patterns and also i am able to
view their stemmed words in the analyzer (solr admin ui) but i a
As it is possible to read in the documentation, the KStemFilter is a soft (
not much aggressive) english stemmer.
As Ahmet properly specified, are you preceding that filter with a lowercase
one ?
What is exactly the stemming you get that doesn't convince you ?
Cheers
2015-07-28 0:16 GMT+
hema for a custom
field type. When I use the interface (Solr) to Analysis the words. I am getting
strange behavior.
E.g. If Add the keyword "Supplies" I am not getting anything like "Supply". Is
this behavior is because of the Kstem, is there any other stemming algorithm
can fix this issue.
Thanks
Ravi
use of the Kstem, is there any other stemming algorithm
can fix this issue.
Thanks
Ravi
Hi Alessandro,
I'm counting word frequencies on a site. All I want to do is, I want to
count "running" and "run" as the same topic.
It's not really fuzzy matching I believe -- i.e. I wouldn't want to match
"running" and "sprinting".
I thi
an run fuzzy queries with the edit distance ( by default calculated
over a Levenstein Automaton) .
This will allow you to run your fuzzy query and leave your index terms as
you want ( without affecting in this way the term frequency) .
Can you give us more details about your use of stemming ?
;experience" -> "experi") before being passed, i.e. termfreq(body, "end-us
experi").
>From what I can tell, FunctionQuery / termfreq doesn't have a way to apply
stemming.
Akos (Aki) Balogh
Co-Founder, MarketMuse
https://www.MarketMuse.com <https://www.mark
Hi Dale,
I would think the coffee shop is better, I have in-laws visiting at home.
Thanks
Darin
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Aki Balogh wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using TermVectorComponent and stemming (Porter) in order to get term
> frequencies with fuzzy ma
1 - 100 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
