Using two fields, as Grant suggested, works very well. For a while, we
used three fields, exact, stemmed, and phonetic. The DisMax handler
makes it very easy to manage that sort of configuration.
wunder
On 12/7/08 12:51 PM, "Bertrand DUMAS-PILHOU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, I have the s
t to.
> So, if you are stemming, then you are losing the original word. A
> common way to solve what you are doing is to actually have two fields,
> where one is stemmed and one is exact (you can do this with the
> mechanism in the Schema). Thus, if you want exact
> match,
On Dec 4, 2008, at 8:19 PM, Jonathan Ariel wrote:
Hi! I'm wondering what solr is really doing with the exact word vs.
the
stemmed word.
So for example I have 2 documents.
The first one has in the title the word "convertible"
The second one has "convert"
When solr stem the titles, both will be
Hi! I'm wondering what solr is really doing with the exact word vs. the
stemmed word.
So for example I have 2 documents.
The first one has in the title the word "convertible"
The second one has "convert"
When solr stem the titles, both will be the same since convertible ->
convert.
Then when I sea
