essing) you
> still need some other param to know what to build a dismax query out of
> with those qf fields.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Standard-vs.-DisMaxQueryHandler-tp6421205p16945850.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t the clinet to specify the exact query
>>> structure that
>>> they want, use StandardRequstHandler. if you want the client to just
>>> propogate the raw search string typed by the user, without any
>>> structure
>>> or escaping, and get the nice complex DisMax style quer
: Either I use defType of DISMAX to get DisjunctionMaxQuery but then I can't
: use prefix queries and more complicated boolean queries, OR I use the
: standard defType which doesn't use DisjunctionMaxQuery.
I think I missunderstood your complaint ... it sounds like you don't care
about (or want)
e query across the
configured fields, the DisMax handler was written to fill that niche.
(load up the example configs, and take a look at the query toString
from
this url to see what i mean about the complex structure...
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?qt=dismax&q=how+now+brown+
gt; isn't very well documented for users yet (but it's not in a release and
> the kinks are still beingworked out, so that's somewhat expected)
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Standard-vs.-DisMaxQueryHandler-tp6421205p16944495.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
gt; isn't very well documented for users yet (but it's not in a release and
> the kinks are still beingworked out, so that's somewhat expected)
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Standard-vs.-DisMaxQueryHandler-tp6421205p16944438.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: I am frustrated that I have to pick between the two because I want both. The
: way I look at it, there should be a more configurable query handler which
: allows me to dimax if I want to, and pick a parser for the user's query
: (like the flexible one used by the standard query handler, or the
ook at the query toString from
> this url to see what i mean about the complex structure...
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?qt=dismax&q=how+now+brown+cow&debugQuery=1
>
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Standard-vs.-DisMaxQueryHandler-tp6421205p16909626.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Is the main difference between the StandardQueryHandler and
: DisMaxQueryHandler the supported query syntax (and different query
: parser used in each of them), and the fact that the latter creates
: DisjunctionMaxQueries, while the former just creates vanilla
: BooleanQueries? Are there any ot
Hi,
Is the main difference between the StandardQueryHandler and DisMaxQueryHandler
the supported query syntax (and different query parser used in each of them),
and the fact that the latter creates DisjunctionMaxQueries, while the former
just creates vanilla BooleanQueries? Are there any other
10 matches
Mail list logo
