I therefore wrote an implementation of SolrSpellChecker that wraps jazzy,
the java aspell library. I also extended the SpellCheckComponent to take
the
matrix of suggested words and query the corpus to find the first
combination
of suggestions which returned a match. This works well for my use ca
Hi Mark,
Thanks for that info looks very interesting, would be great to see your
code. Out of interest did you use the dictionary and the phonetic file? Did
you see better results with both?
In regards to the secondary part to check the corpus for matching
suggestions, would another way to do thi
"Yonik's Law of Patches" reads: "A half-baked patch in Jira, with no
documentation, no tests and no backwards compatibilty is better than no
patch at all."
It'd be perfectly appropriate, IMO, for you to post an outline of what your
enhancements do over on the SOLR dev list and get a reaction from
ike
to see yours to compare.
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Book Company
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Mark Holland [mailto:mark.holl...@zoopla.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 1:04 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spellchecking and frequency
Hi,
I
Hi,
I found the suggestions returned from the standard solr spellcheck not to be
that relevant. By contrast, aspell, given the same dictionary and mispelled
words, gives much more accurate suggestions.
I therefore wrote an implementation of SolrSpellChecker that wraps jazzy,
the java aspell libra
Hi,
I've recently been looking into Spellchecking in solr, and was struck by how
limited the usefulness of the tool was.
Like most corpora , ours contains lots of different spelling mistakes for
the same word, so the 'spellcheck.onlyMorePopular' is not really that useful
unless you click on it nu
