hing along those lines.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: alx...@aim.com [mailto:alx...@aim.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 4:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Thanks.
I can
handleRequestBody and how its arguments are
constructed is not clear.
Thanks.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Dyer, James
To: solr-user
Sent: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 2:08 pm
Subject: RE: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Alex,
I added your comments to SOLR-3758
(https
3 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Hello,
Further investigation shows the following pattern, for both DirectIndex and
wordbreak spellchekers.
Assume that in all cases there are spellchecker results when distrib=false
In distrib
21, 2013 6:50 pm
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Hello,
I am debugging the SpellCheckComponent#finishStage.
>From the responses I see that not only wordbreak, but also directSpellchecker
does not return some results in distributed mode.
The request h
ar 21, 2013 11:23 am
Subject: RE: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
The shard responses get combined in SpellCheckComponent#finishStage . I highly
recommend you file a JIRA bug report for this at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR
. If you write a failing unit test
wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Hello,
We need this feature be fixed ASAP. So, please let me know which class is
responsible for combining spellcheck results from all shards. I will try to
debug the code.
Thanks in advance.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: alxsss
To: solr-user
am
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
-- distributed environment. But to nail it down, we probably need to see both
-- the applicable
Not sure what this is?
I have
spell
direct
spell
solr.DirectSolrSpellChecker
=paulusoles&indent=true&rows=10&shards.qt=testhandler'
0
24
true
testhandler
paulusoles
10
0
0
Thanks.
Alex.
---Original Message-
From: Dyer, James
To: solr-user
Sent: Tue, Mar 19, 2013 11:10 am
Subject: RE: str
as they do with a single index.
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:49 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: s
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: alx...@aim.com [mailto:alx...@aim.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 12:39 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Hello,
I was testing my custom testhandler. Direct spellchecker
.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Dyer, James
To: solr-user
Sent: Tue, Mar 19, 2013 10:30 am
Subject: RE: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Mark,
I wasn't sure if Alex is actually testing /select, or if the problem is just
coming up in /testhandler.
@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 11:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
My first thought too, but then I saw that he had the spell component in both
his custom testhander and the /select handler, so I'd expect
15) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: alx...@aim.com [mailto:alx...@aim.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 4:07 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
>
> Hello,
>
> I try to use wo
m Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: alx...@aim.com [mailto:alx...@aim.com]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 4:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: strange behaviour of wordbreak spellchecker in solr cloud
Hello,
I try to use wordbreak spellchecker in solr-4.2 wi
Hello,
I try to use wordbreak spellchecker in solr-4.2 with cloud feature. We have two
server with one shard in each of them.
curl 'server1:8983/solr/test/testhandler?q=paulusoles&indent=true&rows=10'
curl 'server2:8983/solr/test/testhandler?q=paulusoles&indent=tru
Hi all,
I am using solrmarc + Vufind to index marc records.
solr version is 3.5.0
I am having issues trying to make solrmarc to suggest possible
alternative spellings when querying the database BUT using a non Latin
Based alphabet.
Quering *ounix* suggests *unix* alright
however when query
how can I lowercase query outside of Solr before sending a query?
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conflict-in-wildcard-query-and-spellchecker-in-solr-search-tp3095198p3095345.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
No, wildcard queries are not analyzed. They are not _passed_ through your
analyzers. If you lowercase at index-time, you must lowercase it outside of
Solr before sending a query.
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:35:12 Romi wrote:
> *
>
>
>
> words="stopwords.txt"/>
>
need to include some more filters or what other configurations are
needed
-
Thanks & Regards
Romi
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Conflict-in-wildcard-query-and-spellchecker-in-solr-search-tp3095198p3095290.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list arc
Wildcard queries are not analyzed. Lowercase your query beforehand.
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 14:08:48 Romi wrote:
> Using solr search when i search for rin* it run wildcard query and i get
> the result for ring but when i search for Rin* it run spellchecker and
> then gives the result for ring. w
.com/Conflict-in-wildcard-query-and-spellchecker-in-solr-search-tp3095198p3095198.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I was at the origin of the thread you mentionned; I still didnt made any
progress toward integrating a spell suggestion function in Solr; but
then again, I'm a java and a lucene novice (though I'm learning fast
thanks to all the help on the mailing list!). By all means, if you think
you can do
Hi,
A month ago, the topic of a spell checker in Solr came up (c.f.
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg01254.html ).
Has anyone made any progress with that? If not, I'll have to do this to
scratch my own itch.
Because I'm in a hurry with this, I think I will go with the
: #2 would be even better but as you said, its a lot trickier. For my
: needs, just a spelling suggester would be perfect. Would it require java
: programming, or could I get away with it with the current Solr (adding
: n-gram fields and querying on them)?
If you build the ngrams yourself externa
I had #1 in mind. Everything in my mainIndex is supposed to be correctly
spelled, so I just want to use that as a source for spelling
suggestions. I'd check for suggestions on low numbers of results (no
results, or very few for a one word query).
#2 would be even better but as you said, its a
: I meant it would be a simpler implementation in Solr because you don't
: have to deal with java or any Lucene API's. You just create a document
: for each "correct" word. For example the word "lettuce" would have a
: document:
:
:
: lettuce
: let
: let ett ttu tuc uce
: uce
with copyField, good
: Has anybody successfully implemented a Lucene spellchecker within Solr?
: If so, could you give details on how one would achieve this?
There's really two ways to interpret that question ...
1) built a spell correction suggestion application powered by Solr,
where you manually feed it the
I had the very same article in mind - how would it be simpler in Solr
than in Lucene? A spellchecker is pretty much standard in every major
I meant it would be a simpler implementation in Solr because you don't
have to deal with java or any Lucene API's. You just create a document
for each "corr
I have created one in a sample application (i.e. it works, but I have
not used it in any heavy load or production sense) using the
SpellChecker package from the Lucene 2.1 branch. Solr provides an
excellent foundation for extension, so it is not too difficult to get
going, but it does take some j
eturn text/plain with
suggestions, one per line.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Michael Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:07:19 PM
Subject: Re: Spellchecker in Solr?
I had the very same article in mind - how would it be simpl
I had the very same article in mind - how would it be simpler in Solr
than in Lucene? A spellchecker is pretty much standard in every major
search engine nowadays - with one, Solr would be the best, hands down
(even if it already is :P).
Are your plans to build this anything concrete, or is it
I have not done one but have been planning to do it based on this article:
http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2005/08/09/didyoumean.html
With Solr it would be much simpler than the java examples they give.
On 10/30/06, Michael Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone,
Has anybody succ
Hello everyone,
Has anybody successfully implemented a Lucene spellchecker within Solr?
If so, could you give details on how one would achieve this?
If not, is it planned to make it as standard within Solr? Its a feature
almost every Solr application would want to use, so I think it would be
33 matches
Mail list logo
