precisionStep value only affects range
>>query performance and index size.
>>
>> However, the documentation for TrieDateField says:
>> 'precisionStep="0" enables efficient date sorting and minimizes index
>>size; precisionStep="8" (the defau
ation for TrieDateField says:
> 'precisionStep="0" enables efficient date sorting and minimizes index size;
> precisionStep="8" (the default) enables efficient range queries.'
>
> Does this mean sorting performance will suffer for precisionStep values o
les efficient date sorting and minimizes index size;
precisionStep="8" (the default) enables efficient range queries.'
Does this mean sorting performance will suffer for precisionStep values other
than 0?
Cheers,
Dennis
re any other option than applying a sort= in the query
> to
> achieve the same functionality? Any particular way to index the data to
> achieve the same result? any idea to boost the performance and get the
> intended functionality?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
&g
functionality?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-performance-tp3987633.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
functionality?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-performance-tp3987632.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
g it took from 30 mins up to 2 hours).
>>>
>>> Slave caches are configured to have autowarmCount="0" and
>>> maxWarmingSearchers=1 , and I have new data 1 second after snapshoot is
>>> done. I haven't noticed any huge delays while serving search r
xWarmingSearchers=1 , and I have new data 1 second after snapshoot is
>> done. I haven't noticed any huge delays while serving search request.
>> Try to use those values - may be they'll help in your case too.
>>
>> Ben Janicki
>>
>>
>> -Origin
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay in warming up a cache "co
Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay in warming up a cache "could&qu
lp in your case too.
Ben Janicki
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 October 2008 04:56
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of d
: The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
: continuous flow of document coming in.
: So a delay in warming up a cache "could" be acceptable if I do it a few times
: per day. But not on a too regular basis (right now, the first query that loads
: the cache takes 150s)
I'm now considering if Solr (Lucene) is a good choice when we have a
huge number of indexed document and a large number of new documents
needs to be indexed everyday.
Maybe I'm wrong, but my feeling is that the way the sort caches are
handled (recreated after new commit, not shared between Sea
inal Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:24 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance
christophe wrote:
> When I start indexing new documents, searches are taking long time
> again: is the sort cache flushed when new
The problem is that I will have hundreds of users doing queries, and a
continuous flow of document coming in.
So a delay in warming up a cache "could" be acceptable if I do it a few
times per day. But not on a too regular basis (right now, the first
query that loads the cache takes 150s).
Howe
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:28:23 +0300
christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hum. this mean I have to wait before I index new documents and avoid
> indexing when they are created (I have about 50 000 new documents
> created each day and I was planning to make those searchable ASAP).
you can a
er 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and
indexed fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score
in a few milliseconds. (I display 10 out of 8747
OOM? What -Xmx value are you using? Try increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performan
o not get the OOM each time.
>>>>
>>>> Thx
>>>> Christophe
>>>>
>>>> Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is the sorted query slow only the first time or every time you run it?
>>>>>
>>>>> You g
-- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few
ry increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests
ery time you run
it?
You got an OOM? What -Xmx value are you using? Try increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:
ucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and
indexed fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score in a
few milliseconds.
are you using? Try increasing it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: christophe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
Subject: Sorting performance
Hi,
I'm
o: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:28:52 PM
> Subject: Sorting performance
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
> I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and indexed
> fields.
>
> This query: text:sometex
Hi,
I'm doing some tests with Solr1.3
I have loaded around 7M documents, each with a few stored and indexed
fields.
This query: text:sometext returns the results, sorted by score in a few
milliseconds. (I display 10 out of 8747 matched documents)
This one: text:sometext;id desc takes someth
26 matches
Mail list logo
