Re: Sorting on non-stored field

2012-03-14 Thread Li Li
it should be indexed by not analyzed. it don't need stored. reading field values from stored fields is extremely slow. So lucene will use StringIndex to read fields for sort. so if you want to sort by some field, you should index this field and don't analyze it. On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Fi

Re: Sorting on non-stored field

2012-03-14 Thread Michael Kuhlmann
Am 14.03.2012 11:43, schrieb Finotti Simone: I was wondering: is it possible to sort a Solr result-set on a non-stored value? Yes, it is. It must be indexed, indeed. -Kuli

Sorting on non-stored field

2012-03-14 Thread Finotti Simone
I was wondering: is it possible to sort a Solr result-set on a non-stored value? Thank you