How about creating two fields for the multi-valued field. First, grab the
higher and lower values of the multi-valued field by using natural sort order.
Then use the first field to store the highest order value. Use second field to
store lowest order value. Both these fields are single valued.
The usual strategy is to have an UpdateRequestProcessor chain that
will copy the field and keep only one value from it, specifically for
sort. There is a whole collection of URPs to help you choose which
value to keep, as well as how to provide a default.
You can see the full list at:
http://www.s
fwiw,
open solr jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2522 pls vote
however, everything seems done at lucene level
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5454
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Nitin Solanki wrote:
> Hi Peri,
> You cannot do sort on multi-valued fie
Hi Peri,
You cannot do sort on multi-valued field. It should be set to
false.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Peri Subrahmanya <
peri.subrahma...@htcinc.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Is there a way sorting can work on a multi-valued field or does it always
> have to be “false” for it to w
All,
Is there a way sorting can work on a multi-valued field or does it always have
to be “false” for it to work.
Thanks
-Peri
*** DISCLAIMER *** This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the
mistake in de
