Hi,
we have a fixed number of values in a String field (up to around 100),
that should be used for sorting query results. Is there some way to let
the client specify the sort order as part of its query?
I was thinking about using a function query. Is it possible to specify
the order of value
olrCloud group.query error
: "shard X did not set sort field values" or how i can set fillFields=true
: on IndexSearcher.search
:
: Thank you!
: I really need to eventually increase the number of shards, so I can not
: directly use numshards = X and the only way out - splitshards
shard1_1 - slave
> 9. Commit http://node1:8983/solr/collection1/update?commit=true
> 10. Reload http://node1:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*:* gives me
> different results numFound 5,0,10 (i add 10 docs)
> Node2 core info is
> collection1 - shard1 - 10 docs
> collecti
%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0
returns the familiar error
shard 0 did not set sort field values (FieldDoc.fields is null); you must
pass fillFields=true to IndexSearcher.search on each shard
I somehow did not operate correctly splitshard?
Also, I tried once to indicate the number of shard
jetty.port=7574
> -DzkHost=localhost:9983 -jar start.jar)
> 6. On node2 add new core for collection1 -> shard2. Default core
> "collection1" unload. We have one collection over two shard. Shard1 - have
> data, shard2 - no data.
> 7. Again try group.query
> http://node1:
hard2. Default core
"collection1" unload. We have one collection over two shard. Shard1 - have
data, shard2 - no data.
7. Again try group.query
http://node1:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*:*&group=true&group.query=someFiled:someValue
.
8. Error: shard 0 did not set sort field
On 3/22/2013 8:54 AM, Per Steffensen wrote:
> Me too. I will find out soon - I hope! But re-indexing is kinda a
> problem for us, but we will figure out.
> Any "guide to re-index all you stuff" anywhere, so I do it the easiest
> way? Guess maybe there are some nice tricks about steaming data direct
On 3/21/13 10:50 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/21/2013 4:05 AM, Per Steffensen wrote:
Can anyone else elaborate? How to "activate" it? How to make sure, for
sorting, that sort-field-value for all docs are not read into memory for
sorting - leading to OOM when you have a lot of docs
On 3/21/2013 4:05 AM, Per Steffensen wrote:
Can anyone else elaborate? How to "activate" it? How to make sure, for
sorting, that sort-field-value for all docs are not read into memory for
sorting - leading to OOM when you have a lot of docs? Can this feature
be activated on top of a
o "activate" it? How to make sure, for
sorting, that sort-field-value for all docs are not read into memory for
sorting - leading to OOM when you have a lot of docs? Can this feature
be activated on top of an existing 4.0 index, or do you have to re-index
everything?
Thanks a lot f
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 09:57 +0100, Per Steffensen wrote:
> Thanks Toke! Can you please elaborate a little bit? How to use it? What
> it is supposed to do for you?
Sorry, no, I only know about it on the abstract level. The release notes
for Solr 4.2 says
* DocValues have been integrated into Solr
On 3/21/13 9:48 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 09:13 +0100, Per Steffensen wrote:
We have a lot of docs in Solr. Each particular Solr-node handles a lot
of docs distributed among several replica. When you issue a sort query,
it seems to me that, the value of the sort-field of
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 09:13 +0100, Per Steffensen wrote:
> We have a lot of docs in Solr. Each particular Solr-node handles a lot
> of docs distributed among several replica. When you issue a sort query,
> it seems to me that, the value of the sort-field of ALL docs under the
>
Hi
We have a lot of docs in Solr. Each particular Solr-node handles a lot
of docs distributed among several replica. When you issue a sort query,
it seems to me that, the value of the sort-field of ALL docs under the
Solr-node is added to the FieldCache. This leads to OOM-exceptions at
some
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
> I am tracing QueryComponent.java and would like to know the pourpose of doFSV
> function. Don't understand what fsv are for.
> Have tried some queries with fsv=true and some extra info apears in the
> response:
>
>
It's currently an internal
ead:
// The query cache doesn't currently store sort field values, and
SolrIndexSearcher doesn't
// currently have an option to return sort field values. Because of
this, we
// take the documents given and re-derive the sort values.
Is it for cache pourposes?
Thanks in advance!
On Jul 23, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
Hallo...
I have a problem...
i want to sort a field
at the Moment the field type is "text", but i have test it with
"string" or
"date"
the content of the field looks like "22.07.09" it is a Date.
when i sort, i get :
failed to open stream:
Hallo...
I have a problem...
i want to sort a field
at the Moment the field type is "text", but i have test it with "string" or
"date"
the content of the field looks like "22.07.09" it is a Date.
when i sort, i get :
failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 500
there_are_more_terms
On 6/26/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thks mike,,,the second question is how to calc the ram size i should have
when i wanna index reside completely in RAM.
It's fairly specific to the collection... index a bunch of documents
and see how much space it takes up. Make sure to do a lot
2007/6/27, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 25-Jun-07, at 10:53 PM, James liu wrote:
>
> [quote]how can i use index all with ram and how to config which ram
> i should
> use?[/quote]
Your os will automatically load the most frequently-used parts of the
index in ram.
If your total ram is at
On 25-Jun-07, at 10:53 PM, James liu wrote:
[quote]how can i use index all with ram and how to config which ram
i should
use?[/quote]
Your os will automatically load the most frequently-used parts of the
index in ram. If your total ram is at least as large as the total
JVM heap size p
thks Yonik,and
[quote]how can i use index all with ram and how to config which ram i should
use?[/quote]
On 6/25/07, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
for example, i wanna sort by datetime, does it have to be store='true', and
i wanna define it
That's fine... to sort by a field, it must be indexed. It does not
matter if it is stored.
-Yonik
for example, i wanna sort by datetime, does it have to be store='true', and
i wanna define it
am i right?
if right, iwanna define score like that and how to define it or maybe it was
if my field all use index=true, stored=false, does it means low disk
io and more ram used?
how can i use it
24 matches
Mail list logo
