On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>>
>
> I've just locate a previous message on this list from Mark Miller saying that
> in Solr 4, commitWithin is a soft commit.
Yes, that's true.
>
> You should definitely wait for Mark or another committer to verify what I'm
> saying in t
On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:52 PM, jimtronic wrote:
> Should I omit commitWithin and set DIH to commit=false and just let soft and
> autocommit do their jobs?
Yeah, that's one valid option. You def are not able to keep up with the current
commit / open searcher level. It looks like DIH will do a har
On 3/11/2013 3:52 PM, jimtronic wrote:
The load test was fairly heavy (ie lots of users) and designed to mimic a
fully operational system with lots of users doing normal things.
There were two things I gleaned from the logs:
PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2 appeared for severa
jobs?
Cheers,
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Some-nodes-have-all-the-load-tp4046349p4046476.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
load
> production situation.
>
> I'm sure there's several things I'm doing wrong in all this, so I thought
> I'd see what you guys think.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Some-nodes-have-all-the-load-tp4046349.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ext:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Some-nodes-have-all-the-load-tp4046349.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
