Re: Solritas in production

2012-08-12 Thread Erick Erickson
e me > (wordpress/joomla template hackers at best) go to the apache solr project > and turn away because they cant figure out aspects, or they cant just > install a simple solution. > > Dont dump velocity, it ticks so many boxes. Please add to it! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solritas-in-production-tp3966191p4000661.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solritas in production

2012-08-12 Thread george123
olr project and turn away because they cant figure out aspects, or they cant just install a simple solution. Dont dump velocity, it ticks so many boxes. Please add to it! -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solritas-in-production-tp3966191p4000661.html Sent from

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-12 Thread Erick Erickson
Solaritas was never intended to be used for production situations at all. It's reason for existing is to provide: 1> a way to show something prettier than the XML (or JSON or) responses to Solr queries for people just getting started. 2> a way to provide a very quick proof-of-concept/proto

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-08 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Le 7 mai 2012 à 13:30, Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes a écrit : > Anything else? If fearing DoS attacks by too large queries (e.g. if having millions of documents), consider writing a query-component that can limit the queries. I believe that there's nothing else. paul

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-08 Thread Bill Bell
know services using Solritas as a frontend on a public site? > > My personal opinion is that using Solritas in production is a very bad idea > for us, but have not so much experience with Solr yet, and Solritas > documentation is far from a detailed, up-to-date one, so don't really know > what is it really usable for. > > Thanks, > Andras

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-07 Thread Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes
engine. The > >>> development is almost done, and it seems to be working fine, however > some > >>> of my colleagues come with the idea that we're using it wrong. We're > >> using > >>> it as a service from PHP/Symfony. > >>>

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-07 Thread Paul Libbrecht
owever some >>>> of my colleagues come with the idea that we're using it wrong. We're >>> using >>>> it as a service from PHP/Symfony. >>>> >>>> They think we should use Solritas as a frontend, so site visitors will >>>

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-07 Thread Jan Høydahl
> using >>> it as a service from PHP/Symfony. >>> >>> They think we should use Solritas as a frontend, so site visitors will >>> directly use it, so no PHP will be involved, so it will be use much less >>> infrastructure. One of them said that ev

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-06 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Hi, - Original Message - > Dne 6.5.2012 14:02, András Bártházi napsal(a): >> We're currently evaluating Solr as a Sphinx replacement. The >> development is almost done, and it seems to be working fine >> why you want to replace sphinx with solr? That's an interesting question.  Until

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-06 Thread András Bártházi
Hi, We're currently evaluating Solr as a Sphinx replacement. The >> >> development is almost done, and it seems to be working fine >> > why you want to replace sphinx with solr? > (is it ontopic here?) Solr+Lucene has far more features, and seems to be more extendable as well. - we had problems

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-06 Thread Radim Kolar
Dne 6.5.2012 14:02, András Bártházi napsal(a): We're currently evaluating Solr as a Sphinx replacement. The development is almost done, and it seems to be working fine why you want to replace sphinx with solr?

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-06 Thread Walter Underwood
m PHP/Symfony. >>> >>> They think we should use Solritas as a frontend, so site visitors will >>> directly use it, so no PHP will be involved, so it will be use much less >>> infrastructure. One of them said that even mobile.de using it that way >> (I &

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-06 Thread Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes
e should use Solritas as a frontend, so site visitors will > > directly use it, so no PHP will be involved, so it will be use much less > > infrastructure. One of them said that even mobile.de using it that way > (I > > have found no clue about it at all). > > > > Do you th

Re: Solritas in production

2012-05-06 Thread Jan Høydahl
way (I > have found no clue about it at all). > > Do you think is it a good idea? > > Do you know services using Solritas as a frontend on a public site? > > My personal opinion is that using Solritas in production is a very bad idea > for us, but have not so much experie

Solritas in production

2012-05-06 Thread András Bártházi
l). Do you think is it a good idea? Do you know services using Solritas as a frontend on a public site? My personal opinion is that using Solritas in production is a very bad idea for us, but have not so much experience with Solr yet, and Solritas documentation is far from a detailed, up-to-date