Martin,
I believe this does work. http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax shows
an example (
createdate:[1976-03-06T23:59:59.999Z TO 1976-03-06T23:59:59.999Z+1YEAR) and
it worked on my dataset as well. So it looks like it should be as easy as
appending the gap to the value.
On Mon, Jun 13,
No, that doesn't work yet.
I think we'll need to enhance the Solr query parser in order to support
this.
If that is supported we don't need to use the DataMathParser and this a more
general solution also for other client libraries.
Martijn
On 12 June 2011 20:58, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Martjin,
Martjin,
I had not considered doing something like
manufacturedate_dt:[2007-02-13T15:26:37Z TO 2007-02-13T15:26:37Z+1YEAR]
does this work? If so that completely eliminates the need to use the date
math parsers right?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Martijn v Groningen <
martijn.is.h...@gmail
Hi Jamie, Just letting you know that I've added a comment to SOLR-2523. I
ran into a class dependency issue regarding MathDateParser.
Martijn
On 11 June 2011 16:04, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Awesome Martjin, let me know when you have it comitted and I'll check out
> the latest version. Again than
Awesome Martjin, let me know when you have it comitted and I'll check out
the latest version. Again thanks!
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Martijn v Groningen <
martijn.is.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Good idea! I'll add a getAsFilterQuery method to the patch.
>
> Martijn
>
> On 6 Ju
Hi James,
Good idea! I'll add a getAsFilterQuery method to the patch.
Martijn
On 6 June 2011 19:32, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Small error, shouldn't be using this.start but should instead be using
> Double.parseDouble(this.getValue());
> and
> sdf.parse(count.getValue());
> respectfully.
>
> On M
Small error, shouldn't be using this.start but should instead be using
Double.parseDouble(this.getValue());
and
sdf.parse(count.getValue());
respectfully.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Thanks Martijn. I pulled your patch and it looks like what I was looking
> for. The
Thanks Martijn. I pulled your patch and it looks like what I was looking
for. The original FacetField class has a getAsFilterQuery method which
returns the criteria to use as an fq parameter, I have logic which does this
in my class which works, any chance of getting something like this added to
Hi Jamie,
I don't know why range facets didn't make it into SolrJ. But I've recently
opened an issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2523
I hope this will be committed soon. Check the patch out and see if you like
it.
Martijn
On 2 June 2011 18:22, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> C
Currently the range and date faceting in SolrJ acts a bit differently than I
would expect. Specifically, range facets aren't parsed at all and date
facets end up generating filterQueries which don't have the range, just the
lower bound. Is there a reason why SolrJ doesn't support these? I have
w
10 matches
Mail list logo
