On 3/1/2016 9:30 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Ah ok, in my case even 5.4.1 didn't work with binary request writer, so
> probably we don't face the same issue.
If I set the writer to binary on 5.4.1, it fails too.
My intent when I wrote the program was to use the binary writer, but
apparently I didn't
Ah ok, in my case even 5.4.1 didn't work with binary request writer, so
probably we don't face the same issue.
Shai
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 17:07 Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/29/2016 9:14 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> > Shawn, not sure if it's the same case as yours, but I've hit NPEs
> upgrading
> > to 5
On 2/29/2016 9:14 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Shawn, not sure if it's the same case as yours, but I've hit NPEs upgrading
> to 5.5 too. In my case though, SolrJ talks to a proxy servlets before the
> request gets routed to Solr, and that servlet didn't handle binary content
> stream well.
>
> I had to
Shawn, not sure if it's the same case as yours, but I've hit NPEs upgrading
to 5.5 too. In my case though, SolrJ talks to a proxy servlets before the
request gets routed to Solr, and that servlet didn't handle binary content
stream well.
I had to add another resource method to the servlet which ha
On 2/29/2016 7:01 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/29/2016 6:42 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>> I'm getting this stacktrace after upgrading SolrJ to 5.5.0 in my build
>> client:
>>
>> http://apaste.info/Vpg
>>
>> This is happening with 4.x, 5.3.2-SNAPSHOT, and 5.5.0-SNAPSHOT servers.
> I got a little bit
On 2/29/2016 6:42 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> I'm getting this stacktrace after upgrading SolrJ to 5.5.0 in my build
> client:
>
> http://apaste.info/Vpg
>
> This is happening with 4.x, 5.3.2-SNAPSHOT, and 5.5.0-SNAPSHOT servers.
I got a little bit closer look at the server log. Initially it looked
I'm getting this stacktrace after upgrading SolrJ to 5.5.0 in my build
client:
http://apaste.info/Vpg
This is happening with 4.x, 5.3.2-SNAPSHOT, and 5.5.0-SNAPSHOT servers.
If I configure ivy to pull solrj 5.4.1 instead of the latest version,
everything works without changing the code.
I didn'