Thank you Sir for that confirmation!
Nic
On Wed, 2/5/14, Chris Hostetter wrote:
Subject: Re: SolrCloud query results order master vs replica
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: Wednesday, February 5, 2014, 11:33 AM
: Just
to make sure
: Just to make sure I interpret the results correctly:
: - they all have a score of 1.7046129
: - the order they are presented in is therefore not related to the score,
: it is just the order in which the data is internally stored (like an SQL
: SELECT statement without ORDER BY clause)
The ord
hey are presented in is therefore not related to the score, it is
just the order in which the data is internally stored (like an SQL SELECT
statement without ORDER BY clause)
Follow up question:
- If I want to force a sort operation, I should add a sort parameter in the
query. The first sort
This should only be happening if the scores are _exactly_ the same,
which is actually
quite rare. In that case, the tied scores are broken by the internal
Lucene document
ID, and the relative order of the docs on the two machines isn't
guaranteed to be the
same, the internal ID can change during se
Greetings,
My setup is:
- SolrCloud V4.3
- On collection
- one shard
- 1 master, 1 replica
so each instance contains the entire index. The index is rather small and the
replica is used for robustness. There is no need (IMHO) to split shard the
index (yet, until the index gets bigger).
My que
